My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52001
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:56 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:09:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/2/2006
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 60B Subsidence Evaluation for the South of Divide Mining Area
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subsidence Evaluation For <br />ExMbit 608 South of Divide Mining Area Page 23 <br />• <br />occumng rockfalls-such as remnant boulders at the base of steep slopes, or in the nm-out zones <br />of these areas with a rockfall potential should be documented prior to mining- <br />11.0 EFFECTS OF SUBSIDENCE AND MINE-INDUCED SEISMIC <br />ACTMTY ON MAN-MADE STRUCTURES AND RENEWABLE <br />RESOURCES <br />Man-made structures and renewable resources in the South of Divide mining area basically <br />consist of 1) a reservoir (Minnesota Reservoir), 2) stock watering ponds, 3) streams (primarily <br />Dry Fork and the upper part of Lick Creek), 4) roads, and 5) local cabins. Minnesota Reservoir, <br />the ponds, and the Deep Creek Ditch diversion to Dry Fork serve the dual purpose of being both <br />man-made structures and containment structures for the valuable water resources in the area. <br />Based on annual subsidence observations in the Jumbo Mountain, Apache Rocks, and Box <br />Canyon mining areas during the last ten years, the following information is considered <br />appropriate for the South of Divide mining area. <br />11.1 Minnesota Reservoir <br />Minnesota Reservoir, which provides storage water primarily for irrigation, is located between <br />two landslides~ne beginning at the north shore and the other beginning at the south shore. As <br />explained in Section 10,1.1 (above), landslide movement on Jumbo Mountain occurred during <br />unusually wet periods before mining began, during mining, and after mining and subsidence was <br />complete. The conclusions were that landslide movement occurs in response to ground <br />saturation and is not noticeably affected by subsidence and seismic activity produced by <br />longwall mining beneath, or near, landslide areas. <br />Both the landslides on Jumbo Mountain and those north and south of Minnesota Reservoir occur <br />in surficial material (loose rock, gravel, sand, silt, clay, and soil) and local bedrock outcrops. <br />The author therefore expects drat the mining of longwall panel E9 will not noticeably affect the <br />large landslide south of Minnesota Reservoir. <br />Mining of the nine longwall mining panels in the Soutlt of Divide mining area, as currently <br />planned (Map 1) will not affect Minnesota Reservoir. The reservoir is located outside the area of <br />mining influence, using the most conservative 45-degree angle of draw. <br />In order to verify and demonstrate the accuracy of predictions, based on the results of past <br />subsidence observations in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon mining areas, it is recommended <br />that three procedures be implemented to monitor this stntcnue prior to mining. The following <br />procedures will be implemented in order to account for seasonal precipitation changes. <br />Conduct periodic aerial photo surveys of the landslides located north and south of dre <br />reservoir, using the July 2004 photos as a baseline reference. <br />• <br />831-032.690 WnghtWaferEngineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.