Laserfiche WebLink
Subsidence Evaluation For <br />Exhibit 606 South of Divide Mining Area Page 14 <br />• <br />5.8 Critical Extraction Width of Mining Panels <br />Critical extraction width (We) is the width of mining panels necessary for maximum subsidence <br />to occur at a given overburden depth (d). Values for W„/d typically range from about I.0 to 1.4, <br />with an average of about 1.2. Based on the subsidence development data for the 5th IVyV <br />longwall panel, the critical extraction width may be closer to the average value of 1.2 than 1.4 in <br />the South of Divide mining area (Figure 4). <br />5.9 Results of Computer Modeling <br />A computer software package was used to model the results of subsidence measurements at West <br />Elk Mine and to project subsidence in the South of Divide mining area_ The package used is <br />entitled: "Comprehensive and Integrated Subsidence Prediction Model (CISPM)," Version 2.0, <br />by Syd S. Peng and Yi Luo, Department of Mining Engineering, College of Mineral and Energy <br />Renounces, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. This program performed an <br />influence function analysis and best fit of West Elk Mine subsidence data. The fit between the <br />data points and the influence function output from dte model is shown in Figure 6. Considering <br />that there was some F Seam influence on the B Seam subsidence data, the actual subsidence <br />measurements and subsidence profiles predicted by the influence function model compare <br />favorably. <br />Baseline subsidence measurements in the current West Elk Mine subsidence monitoring area <br />• were selected such that subsidence parameters from longwall mining in the B Seam were <br />obtained with as little influence from prior room-and-pillaz mining as possible. in this way, the <br />longwall mining subsidence parameters from the monitoring area could be used to most <br />accurately project longwall mining subsidence parameters into the South of Divide mining area. <br />The baseline subsidence measurements selected for both conceptual modeling and computer <br />modeling were October 1991, which was before B Seam longwall mining began and after F <br />Seam room-and-pillaz mining was completed in the subsidence monitoring network area. <br />Once the computer program was calibrated to the West Elk Mine subsidence data, subsidence <br />was then projected into South of Divide mining area using representative coal extraction <br />thicknesses and overburden depths for the respective panels in order to obtain an independent <br />check on the subsidence projections based on the conceptual model (Table 1). Comparison of <br />the author's conceptual model and the influence function computer model of Peng and Luo show <br />the following: <br />Comparison of the author's conceptual model calculations and the influence function computer <br />model of Peng and Luo {which were done by the Wright Water Engineers, Inc. in Figures 7 and <br />8) show dre following: <br />1. Maximum vertical displacement (subsidence) above the chain pillars in the transverse <br />profile (Figure T) is close to the maximum values predicted in the conceptual model <br />calculations. Maximum vertical displacement above the longwall panel centers, <br />however, is about equal to the median values projected in the conceptual model <br />calculations. <br />831-032690 WiigMWaterF~gineers, tnc. <br />