Laserfiche WebLink
• Results of numerous samples are presented in Table 4.8-8 for the Coyote Gulch site, S11. A large <br />decrease in TDS was observed beginning 2120/80 at this site. Samples before this date were obtained <br />from aground-water seep below the dam, white samples after this date are from surface discharge from <br />Coyote Reservoir. A much smaller fluduation in concentrations is observed at the Coyote site than at <br />the No Name sites because a very large retention time is obtained in Coyote reservoir. The analysis of <br />Coyote reservoir water in July of 1980 as refleded in Table 4.8-9, shows that the water in the reservoir <br />is very good. <br />Results for sites S12 and S13 (Buzzard Gulch) show some significant concentrations of TSS and total <br />iron with ma>amum values of 720 and 28 mg/1, resped'nrey. The p subscript indicates the sample was <br />taken from the settling pond just upstream of the sampling site. The TDS for the two analyses of site <br />S'12 are very low for runoff from the Trapper Mlne drainages. Two analyses from the ok1 Empire <br />Energy pit, which interoepts most of the Buzzard Gulch drainage upstream of S12 and S13, are <br />presented. The TDS in the ok1 Empire Energy pit was much lower in July of 1980 than in March of <br />1979. Water quality in this okl mine pit was good. <br />u <br /> <br />4221 <br />PR-~} <br />P1JAY 13 1998 <br />