My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE51930
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE51930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:53 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
pages 4-172 to 4-222z
Section_Exhibit Name
4.8 Hydrologic Impacts
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ The TDS at the No Name site ~6'S) which is downstream of the Last sediment pond, <br />was observed to vary from 186 to 2230 mg/1. Most concentrations of TDS from the <br />Nu Name site wece greater than 1000 mg/l. Similar concentrations were also <br />observed for the downstream No Name site, S9, which is located approximately one <br />mile downstream of site S5. Roads were the only disturbance in No Name drainage <br />until 1979. The TSS in No Name has varied considerably during the Last Eour <br />years. A significant difference between the two No Name sites has been observed. <br />Additional load entering No Name Gulch between the two sites probably caused the <br />higher concentrations downstream on 3/07/80. The lowest pH which was observed in <br />the surface water from the two No Name sites was 6.7. Total iron and manganese <br />concentrations have varied considerably in the surface water in No Name Gulch. <br />Some of the results Eor the No Name sites in Table 4.8-8 are probably representa- <br />tive of baseline conditions. Table 4.8-9 gives the concentrations from samples <br />which were taken from the settling reservoirs. Results are given Eor Nu Name <br />reservoirs 2 and 4. Concentrations in the No Name reservoirs are similar to the <br />values measured at the surface water sites. <br />Several analyses of constituents for [he Yampa (S7) and Williams Fork Rivers <br />~' X510) are presented in Table 4.8-8. TDS of these two major streams does not <br />fluctuate over as large a range as the Trapper Mine ephemeral drainages. <br />• <br />4-218 <br />REVISED FFA 2 ~ 'R7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.