My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE51928
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE51928
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:53 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002119
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/2/2003
Doc Name
Geotechnical Stability of Topsoil Pile
From
DMG
To
Elam Construction Inc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
According to Mr. Lewicki's geologic description, "significant scraping with a knife is needed to <br />break out sizable amounts of the fines" indicating that the material may fall under an R3 rock <br />classification. If this is the case, the applicant may need to concentrate on evaluating adverse <br />fracture orientations, which would include conducting a field fracture mapping program to <br />evaluate azeas where natural fractures may be problematic. <br />The applicant did not address fracture orientations in the topsoil stockpile azea so, in my opinion, <br />the applicant did not comply with Rule 6.5(1) since a complete geotechnical evaluation of all <br />geologic hazazds was not submitted. However, it seems to me that DMG requirements could get <br />awful complicated to ensure that the temnorazy highwalls aze stable during mining operations. <br />These highwalls are going to be backfilled in order to create the final slope (which is proposed to <br />be 3:1). If a portion, or all, of the highwall fails, the worst thing that would happen is the topsoil <br />would probably be lost or mixed in with other materials and, therefore, unusable as a growth <br />medium. To resolve the problem, the applicant could import, or salvage, sufficient topsoil <br />material to provide the approved thickness of topsoil that the applicant committed to and include <br />sufficient funds in the financial warranty to import the material. <br />I would like to recommend that the applicant choose between two options; 1) conduct a fracture <br />mapping program of the topsoil stockpile area to determine if there are adverse fracture <br />orientations that could cause the highwall to fail prior to being backfilled (submit a revised <br />mining plan if there is a high probability that the fracture orientations will cause a failure of the <br />highwall), or 2) in addition to current proposed commitments (20 foot setback, conducting <br />quarterly inspections of the highwall, etc.), the applicant shall commit to importing sufficient <br />topsoil to complete reclamation and shall commit to provide sufficient funds in the financial <br />warranty to import an amount of topsoil sufficient to provide the required layer of growth <br />medium over a phased disturbed area. <br />cc: Harry Posey (e-mail) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.