My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE51904
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE51904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:52 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:06:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEYS
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 45
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kerr Coal Company of Steamboat Springs, Colorado has submitted <br />• <br />a Temporary Use Permit Application (CO-010-TU-78-17) to conduct coal <br />mining activities on 35 acres of BLM land in North Park, Colorado. <br />The specific location of the area is the E~, Wk, NWT, Section 2, TBN, <br />R78W, Jackson County, Colorado. That area can be found on the Johnny <br />Moore Mountain 7~' topographic USGS quad map (cf. Figure 1). <br />At the request of Kerr Coal Co., a cultural resources inventory <br />• <br />was conducted of the area by Joseph J. Lischka on August 26, 1978 under <br />the authorization of Professional Services Antiquity Permit 78-CO-043 <br />issued by the Departmental Consulting Archeologist, U.S. Department of <br />the Interior to the University of Colorado at Boulder. The legal <br />description of the area to be surveyed was supplied to Lischka in a <br />letter from Kerr Coal Co. dated August 17, 1978. A~topographic map <br />with the area to be surveyed marked on it was also supplied to Lischka. <br />An official of Kerr Coal Co. escorted Lischka to the area to be surveyed <br />and indicated the limits of the area. There is a barbed wire fence <br />marking the north half of the east side of the survey area and the rest <br />of the boundary of the survey area was unmarked. The unmarked portions <br />of the boundary were determined by referring to the topographic map, which <br />was relatively easy to do because of the relatively large degree of <br />topographic variability in the area.' In any case, the cultural resources <br />survey was extended approximately 100 meters beyond the estimated boundary <br />where unmarked. <br />The area was surveyed by walkingnorth-south transects spaced approx- <br />• <br />imately 10 meters apart. In addition, transects were walked along the <br />crests of 3 east-west trending ridges in the survey area. Vegetation <br />in the survey area consists of scattered sagebrush and associated grasses. <br />Ground visibility was estimated to be 70-80% in most of the survey area. <br />A few patches of heavier sagebrush on ridges reduced visibility there <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.