My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE51869
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE51869
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:51 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:05:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1996049
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/16/1996
Doc Name
L G EVERIST 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION
From
ROBERT A WYLER
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
09{16{96 16:21 DES -~ 303 832 8106 <br />N0.059 D06 <br />-- ~. <br />u <br />To: Ric Pocius, Brian Peters <br />From: T.aae Wyatt <br />Date: July 12, 1996 <br />RE: Maryland Creek Ranch Conditional Use Permit <br />Per your request I have reviewed the Maryland Creek Conditional Use Permit Application for <br />general comments and conforntiry to the Areawide Water Quality Management Plaa (Z08 Plan). <br />The proposed gravel muting operation at Maryland Creek Ranch is an approved use within the <br />A-1 zoning district, it is the concrete .plant, asphalt plain and processing plant which requirt the <br />Conditions( Use Permit. The application goes into some detail on the mining operation, <br />however, provides very little information on the actual uses requiring this application. Thezefore <br />the following commenu are general in nature. <br />L. The application indicates that there will be no new impacts, in general, because the operation <br />is essentially being moved across the highway, This seems to imply that the eASting site wr71 be <br />fully reclaimed prior to commencing operation at the new site. <br />2. The etristing agricultural ditches that are proposed to remain on site after conversion to a <br />mining operation should be protected with berms or other techniques to insure that they do eot <br />became conduits to carry sediment and other polhrtaats off site. Runoff drainsge systems should <br />be designed to contain the ttmoff on site and utilize inSltration to prevem off site sedimentation <br />problems. (sa Poliq 3, 208 Plan) <br />3. This facility, sad the conditions{ uses contemplated, appear to require a CPDES swttnwater <br />permit for industrial activities. Phis permit should address many of the potential issues of concern <br />such as pwteetion from spillage ofpetrochemicals stored on site, disposal ofwash water, <br />operation and maintenance of eay mnoff treatment systems, etc. Tf the faality is required by <br />Colorado Depatmreat of Health to have this permit it should be a condition for approval. (see <br />Policy 4, 208 Plan) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.