My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE51767
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE51767
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:47 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:03:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/9/1996
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 13 Disposal Area Stability Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />• Effective Stress k7 = 25', C = 500 psf <br />Total Stress P1= 15', C = 750 psf <br />Unit Weight y = 125 pcf <br />Spoil strength and density is difficult to measure in laboratory or field tests <br />due to the large particle sizes. The angle of repose is considered a good indicator <br />of friction angle. Our experience and technical review indicated a friction angle of <br />34 degrees with no cohesion (total or effective), and a unit weight of 100 pcf are <br />conservative but realistic values. <br />RESULTS OF STABILITY ANALYSIS <br />The stability analyses were performed using the simplified Bishop method. <br />Normal parameters were selected for strength and density. For this condition <br />factors of safety of 1.6 (total stress, construction phase) and 1.9 to 2.0 effective <br />stress, long term) were calculated. <br />• <br />The effects of water buildup within the fill were evaluated by simulating water <br />buildup to two levels as shown on Fig. A•I. The worst case water conditions <br />(extending to the toe) show low factors of safety for slump failures near the toe (1.3 <br />to 1.4). This is expected and indicates that drainage and control of subsurface water <br />are critical near the toe. The less severe water conditions (water buildup limited to <br />back 3/4 of fill) indicate factors of safety on the order of 1.5 to 1.8. Although these <br />may be considered adequate, sutable drainage through this zone is still considered <br />necessary. <br />The factor of safety is not particularly sensitive to variations in spoil unit <br />weight. The models are sensitive to the clay friction and cohesion values. As shown <br />on Fig. A-2 the factor of safety drops rapidly, particularly with respects to the friction <br />of the clay layer. Based upon our experience and the information available at this <br />time, we believe suitable strength values will likely be found in the residual/colluvial <br />• clays anticipated over most of fill sites. Softer/looser soils may require removal in <br />LORENOITO COAL COMPANY <br />CM 35,251 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.