Laserfiche WebLink
1. <br />t,; ~. <br />c~/q ~u a <br />ySy~~ . Moog <br />Y•'J ~S~„ <br />t'• (~Sb.Xnt <br />~ri5 Mr r~~~ `C Nl~l~ti+++s <br />•• MICHAEL C. IRELAND, P.C. •• <br />Attorney at law <br />225 North Mill Street, Suite2Qf 2~3 <br />Aspen, Colorado 8161 I ! ~ r <br />Telephone: 7B3 925.5358 ~ ~ !~ <br />Facsimile: 381925-9220 { ~ (? <br />990 tl!i <br />June 7, 1999 <br />Mr. Dan Jackson <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />r. I I ~ <br />199 <br />~~ ~ ~.' <br />Er'A itEGIGN VII1. <br />Mr. Chuck Williams (SP_W_GW) I (J~ /~ ~ <br />US Environmental Protection Agency ~~/c liL1NL~ • ,li (~ ,l /t- ~ <br />999 18a' Street, Suite 500 <br />Denver CO 80202-2466 <br />Re: Draft UIC Permit and Statement of Basis, Yankee Gulch Project <br />Dear Messrs. Williams and Jackson: <br />I am in receipt of the above referenced Drafi UIC Permit documents and am writing to <br />express concern about both the procedures utilized in issuing them and their substantive content. <br />First and foremost, I am disappointed that the defects in the water quality data discussed by <br />myself and Mr. Jackson in April appear to have been glossed over in issuing the draft permit and <br />statement of basis. It appears that the EPA has accepted without further review the applicant's <br />representation that the Lower Aquifer does not meet USDW standards in spite of some rather <br />anomalous data points offered by the applicant and in spite of contrary evidence brought to my <br />attention. <br />I am also disappointed that I was not sent a copy of the Statement of Basis and Draft UIC <br />Permit as promised during my discussion with Mr. Jackson. I ordered a copy though the BLM <br />but would have appreciated receiving the documents as promised without the time and expense of <br />requesting them. <br />Of much greater concern is the selective, unsupported embrace of anomalous data points <br />as characteristic of the llpper and Lower Aquifer. The Statement of Basis and Draft Permit <br />describe the Upper Aquifer as follows: <br />oThe data indicates that USDWs are probably confined to the Uinta portion of the Upper <br />Aquifer. TDS concentrations indicate that TDS increases dramatically with the depth of <br />the Green River Formation (Parachute Creek Member) portion of the Upper Aquifer, with <br />the water sample from 811 feet, immediately above the Mahogany Zone, yielding a <br />concentration of 15,900 mg/I. <br />Lower Aquifer. TDS concentrations ranging from 38,000 mg/I to 60,000 mg/1 have been <br />reported in the Lower Aquifer. A water sample taken from the Lower part of the Lower <br />Aquifer at the American Soda monitoring well 20-I in June 1997 exhibited a TDS <br />concentration of 61,6000 mg/I at a depth of approximately 1,400 ft near the dissolution <br />surface **** There have been some questions regarding the construction of this well and <br />