My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE51652
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE51652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:41 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:00:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004031
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/3/2004
Doc Name
Application (2nd Half)
From
Aggregate Industries - WCR Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Two methods were used in the computer analysis for determining safety factors; the <br />Simplified Bishop's Procedure and the JanBu procedure- Both procedures seazch for <br />circulaz shear failures and automatically search for the lowest safety factor. 1500 <br />sepazate failure surfaces were analyzed for each case. The required minimum safety <br />factors are based on the current standazds used by the State Engineer in evaluating <br />embankment dams. <br />SLOPE STABILITY RESULTS <br />The calculated factors of safety are within the design criteria specified for this project and <br />can be considered indicators of the embankment performance under the various <br />conditions. The results of the slope stability analysis are presented in Table 2. <br />Table 2 -Slope Stability Analysis Results <br />Description Calculated Factor <br />Of Safety Required Minimum <br />Factor Of Safety <br />Case 1 - 104 Avenue 1.28 1.25 <br />Case 2 -Adjacent Buildings 1.28 1.25 <br />Case 3 -Fulton Ditch 1.27 1.25 <br />Case 4 -South Platte River 126 1.25 <br />Case 5 - Howe/Haller Pit 1.32 1.25 <br />Case 6 -Steady State Condition 2.1 I I.50 <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS <br />Case 1 -The resulting safety factor bf 1.28 is above the State Engineers minimum <br />requirement of 1.25 for an embankment during construction. The proposed setback of 45 <br />feet from the Right-of--Way line is satisfactory. <br />Case Z -The resulting safety factor of 1.28 is above the State Engineers minimum <br />requirement of 1.25 for an embankment during construction. The proposed setback of 55 <br />feet from the property line and 60 feet from the buildings is satisfactory. <br />Case 3 -The resulting safety factor of 1.27 is above the State Engineers minimum <br />requirement of 1.25 for an embankment during construction. The proposed setback of 85 <br />feet from the property line and 107 feet from the edge of the Fulton ditch is satisfactory. <br />Case 4 -The resulting safety factor of 1.26 is above the State Engineers minimum <br />requirement of 1.25 for an embankment during construction. The proposed setback of 40 <br />feet from property line and 160 feet from the outside top of bank of the South Platte <br />River is satisfactory. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.