My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO22303
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO22303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:43:23 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:54:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
7/14/1981
Doc Name
GEOTECHNICAL SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION CODUCTED ON HAUL ROAD 1 EMBANKMENT SENECA II MINE
Permit Index Doc Type
PROF POND CERTIFICATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Engineers and Geologists <br />Penetration Test for the 95% confidence level are 13 and 18. Figure 10 <br />shows the results of a similar best fit for data used or the cohesion- <br />less soil group using linear regression analysis. The value of the <br />mean for sample distribution is equal to 15.4. The standard deviation <br />is equal to 8.5 and the variance is equal to 70.4. Forty-one entries <br />were used for samples. The values obtained were correlated to <br />relative density by means of charts in Figure 7 of this report. <br />(Using the sampler energy input and a given Standard Penetration Test <br />value, a relative density can be determined for an implace soil. Using <br />this relative density,Winterkorn and Fang (reference 7), present the <br />results of nine studieson.an.g:le of internal friction vs. relative <br />density with respect to gradations and angularity of the granular soil <br />samples). The value for the angle of internal friction used in the <br />analysis is equal to 34 degrees. This value is conservative due to the <br />fact that the lower end confidence interval value obtained was used <br />for relative density determination. <br />GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS <br />Seepage Analysis. A Casagrande analysis using a graphical method was <br />used to determine the exit height of the phreatic surface and the rate <br />of seepage, using Gilboy's chart as presented in Harr's Ground Water <br />and See a e book (See Bibliography, Reference No. 3). Slope angle and <br />geometry of the maximum cross-section were used in conjunction with <br />ratio of 1/3 of the horizontal distance from the upstream toe to <br />the phreatic surface embankment interface to the vertical head applied. <br />This ratio and the slope angle determine an emperical coefficient for <br />further seepage analysis. Using the 100 year, 24 hour maximum water <br />level, and the 10 year, 24 hour maximum level, expected seepage values <br />were calculated assuming flow through the embankment. Seepage through <br />the foundation due to low permeability of the bedrock was neglected. <br />For the 100 year, 24 hour maximum flood the amount of seepage through <br />the embankment at the maximum section is estimated to be on the order <br />-g- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.