PERMFILE51443

• Permit No: C1981031
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 12/11/2001
• Section_Exhibit Name: Section 3: Rule 2.04
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

I
•
Table 2.04.7(1)_6.We11 Discription and Water Quality Analysis of Well T
COLORADO AGRICULTURAL EXPFRIPiENT STATION
Animal Disease Section
Fort Collins, Colorado
Chemical Analysis
Qf~! aJe.~ b~. ~ ~ e,..~.x.P S-~
Mrs. Matt Viena Jr. ~ +~ 5-a~ u~~~ ~s Sao f~
Pryer, Colorado '
Ittap SD T)
Below we report a partial analysis of~the sample of Hater submitted by you
on
n exce en
city water
euoply _
good pot-
able water our same e,
of water
o eo 1 ppm# 1420
olatile matter (organic & Bp0) pp 50 126
genic matter trace trace none
section (acid - alkaline) 6.5 - 7.5 PA 6.5 - 7.5 P 8.3
sea
Ca0 -Lima 10 200 ppm slight
g0 - magnesia b 100 ppm heavy
Napo - soda 4 25-75 ppm heavy
Fe" - Fe" ~ - iron none ,5 ppm none
ip0 - lithium none trace
cids
03 - nitrates (toxic) none none trace
C1 - chlorides (table salt) trace S0 ppm heavy
D3 - sulfates trace 200 ppm moderate
02 - bicarbonates mostly 150 ppm heavy
pS - sulfides (toxic) eons none none
+ arts aer million
' Chemically year water is graded: (1) excellent; (2) good; (3) fair; (1:) ~msafe
'' - ""Y'hie'vateT"should De gveaciona6le- ~ _- for household 71se
for livestock use ~~ ""' ~~~'"
for irrigation ;'
A bacteriological a s ma,V a obtainea m your local health aervice.,~
.. COt44F1~ITS s
"" ~h'his water has reached the reconmended limit far total :Solids.
The ^salts^ effect is its ,greatest drawback. .,
W. B. King, Chemistry Department
'~ _

'
i < v
~A~~ ~
~ ~ ~
~O1(4
_
„~.
_ .