My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO22259
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO22259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:43:21 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:52:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
10/24/1990
Doc Name
Request for Determination on Effluent Standards
From
MLRD
To
CDOH
Permit Index Doc Type
CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ <br />iii iiiiiiiiuiiiiii ~ <br />STATE OF CULV 9t~.v~ <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.. Room 215 <br />Denver. CO 80203 <br />303 866 3557 <br />Fn x. 303 832-8106 <br />October 24, 1990 <br />Ms. Sandy Marek <br />Water Quality Control Division <br />Colorado Department of Health <br />4210 East 11th Avenue <br />Denver, Colorado 80220 <br />RE: Apex No. 2 Mine, Sunland Mining Corporation, File No. C-81-011 <br />Dear Ms. Marek: <br />OF ~~OCp <br />~4 /_ 9 <br />.~r:~o <br />N~~~ <br />IH 76 ~ <br />Roy' Romer. <br />Governor <br />Frea R Banta. <br />Drviswn Direaar <br />This letter is written to request a determination regarding the applicability <br />of effluent standards to runoff leaving portions of the Apex No. 2 idine, in <br />Routt County. Earlier this year, we granted two "small area. exemptions" for <br />this mine (pursuant to our Rule 4.05.2(3)). Before we can issue such <br />exemptions, the operator must demonstrate that the drainage leaving the area <br />will "meet the effluent limitations of Rule 4.05.2 and the applicable state <br />and federal water quality requirements for downstream receiving waters." I <br />have enclosed a copy of our Rule 4.05.2 for your reference. <br />The two portions of the Apex No. 2 Mine for which exemptions were granted are <br />as follows: <br />1. A mine office location, which encompasses about 0.11 acres. This <br />parcel of ground includes an office building, and a graveled border <br />area. The building is outside of the mine drainage control <br />system. Drainage from the building area flows to a county road <br />ditch, which is not part of the mine drainage control system. <br />Drainage to the road ditch is predominately sheetflow. <br />2. A mine fan bench, which encompasses about 0.05 acres. The bench is <br />located on a hill slop e, and both the bench and hill slope are well <br />vegetated. Drainage from this bench would pass off of the bench, <br />then down the slope. There is no evidence of concentrated flow <br />leaving the fan bench, and the bench is outside the mine drainage <br />control system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.