HYDRO22254 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

last 40 years. It is nearly impossible to correct and account for the cross flow contamination from the sampling intervals by purging large volumes of borehole fluids. In a similar open hole case in the Piceance Basin, hundreds of gallons per minute were measured entering the Dissolution Surface Aquifer from the overlying A and B Groove Aquifers. As a result of casing and cementing the overlying aquifers before penetrating the Dissolution Surface Aquifer, AmerAlia gained nearly virgin water quality samples as the av-only drilling method penetrated the sampling interval whereby filling fresh cuttings and formation water to the surface. Thus, high quality sampling interval confirmation and water sampling was achieved during both the drilling and completion of each of these wells along with the following montlily sampling event. These Dissolution Surface Aquifer waters aze not fit for human, agricultural or animal consumption. This water kills plants and poisons the soil if released to the ground. The nearest approved disposal site far this water is 90 miles away. Use of a disposal site for redundant ground water sampling is both costly and wntrary to responsible management. Best management practices would be those practices which avoid the environmental consequences and liability of exposure of unnecessary waste production, transportation, and disposal of such fluids. A single well bore purge event for either of these wells produces approximately 2,300 gallons of fluid. Without factoring in the high TDS and elevated specific gravity, water produced during a single purge event for both wells exceeds the capacity of a water truck. AmerAlia does not endorse the low volume aquifer monitoring well sampling technique. The historical and ongoing sampling problems and miss-information generated by low volume well sampling technignes aze well documented in the Piceance Basin. AmerAlia believes a high quality monitoring well drilling and completion technique followed by high volume sampling supersedes hundreds of micro purged sampling events of poorly or questionably constructed monitoring wells. AmerAlia notes that WRNM's mine plan commingles mining solutions with aquifer waters near the Dissolution Surface. The in-situ pressure of the commingled waters is measured by recording water levels and is controlled to provide pressure gradient protection of the overlying USDW aquifers. Aquifer protection wmpliance is documented with a continuous in-situ pressure record and monthly aquifer water quality sampling of the USDW aquifers. Monthly water quality sampling of the Dissolution Surface Aquifer merely documents the commingling effects and does not protect or document protection of the overlying aquifers. AmerAlia notes that American Soda used the lower aquifer above the Dissolution Surface for injection and disposal of mining solution. Disposal of injected mining solution both pressurizes and commingles Dissolution Surface Aquifer waters with mining solutions. AmerAlia does not know if the aquifers at the American Soda site are protected by a favorable in-situ pressure gradient, if the gradient has been maintained, or if in-situ pressures aze continuously recorded to detemrirre the impacts of the disposal injection activity. Unlike WRNM and American Soda, AmerAlia has not asked to permit a mine plan which included commingled mining solutions with Dissolution Surface Aquifer waters. Instead AmerAlia intends to avoid contaminating the Dissolution Surface Aquifer waters with mining solutions and monitor water pressures or levels as assurance.