My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE51305
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE51305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:50:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/17/2004
To
DMG
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 2003 Report Section 3.0 to 7.0
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The water-level changes for the HI aquifer have generally been influenced less by <br />slightly less than average recharge during the last sbc years. The mining upgradient of HI <br />wells G&5 and GF4, which occurred several years ago, has been long enough in the past <br />to allow water levels to fully recover. The water levels in these HI aquifer wells seem to be <br />varying only Blighty with changes in recharge rates. Water levels in these two wells were <br />fairly steady in 2003 with the slightly bekwv normal precipitation. Water levels are not likey <br />to ever rewver to their pre-mine level in well GB-5. The elevation of the backfilt springs <br />likey limits the head buildup in the backfill aqu""fifer, which, in tum, limits the maximum head <br />in the downgradient coal aquifer. Similar water-level responses are being observed in the <br />two baddill equivalent HI aquifer welts GF5 and GF7, Water levels seem to have reached <br />recovered levels in these two wells. The development of baddill springs may limit the <br />maximum water level in some of these areas of the A pit. <br />The water levels in the three GE wells stabil¢ed in approximatey 1990. This is <br />thought to be due to the length of time since dewatering stopped at the adjacent <br />underground operation. Gradualy declining water levels were observed in these three wells <br />with the below normal precipdation. <br />Water levels in the baddill areas are depressed and are not likey to ever recover to <br />pre-mine levels except near the northern end of the mine area. Map 2-1 shows that the <br />levels in the backfill and downgradient aquifers are similar. Well pairs GD-3 & GD-2 and GF <br />11 & GF6 present water levels that are very similar in water-level elevation for the backfill <br />and downgredient QR aquifer well. Mining is significantly increasing the permeability of the <br />baddill aquifers which is a benefit relative to potential yields from the aquifer. The <br />increased permeability will likey not allow water levels to recover to pre-mine levels in the <br />6-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.