Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />L1 <br />HOM~_Sb t1KE <br />QRANTH OFFICE <br />Mr. Thomas Malecek, District Ranger <br />Rio Grande National Forest <br />Divide Ranger District <br />13308 West Highway 160 <br />Del Norte, Colorado 81132 <br />9 August 2004 <br />Alan D. Cox <br />Project Manager -Bulldog <br />R~ry~~ <br />y~i; , <br />Re: Bulldog Mine Reclamation Project, Mineral County, CO <br />Water Quality Monitoring in Windy Gulch . <br />Deaz Mr. Malecek: <br />. ~ ZQD~ <br />On,/slOoo ~nE2% ~~4~ <br />%gy» <br />This letter provides an update on the water quality monitoring activities that have been conducted by <br />Homestake in Windy Gulch as per our letter to you of July 14, 2004. The monitoring that has been <br />conducted in Windy Gulch follows the plan described in our letter to the Forest Service dated <br />August 23, 2002. As per this monitoring plan, the goal for reclamation efforts is to meet Agricultural <br />Standazds in Windy Gulch at the tower weir, which is near the confluence of Windy Gulch and <br />Willow Creek. <br />Although the reclamation activities in the Windy Gulch azea were substantially completed in the fall <br />of 2002, Windy Gulch did not flow below Bachelor Road during 2003 due to the regionally dry <br />conditions. As a result, no monitoring data could be collected in 2003. Windy Gulch began to flow <br />below Bachelor Road in late March 2004 and monitoring activities were implemented according to the <br />plan. Monitoring activities have included the measurement of flow at the upper weir (at Bachelor <br />Road) and the lower weir (at the mouth of Windy Gulch). Monthly water quality samples were also <br />collected at each location for laboratory analysis. See attached map for locations of the two sampling <br />points. <br />Flows measured during 2004 by data loggers located at the upper and lower weirs in Windy Gulch aze <br />shown on Figure 2. Flows varied from about 0.25 to 0.5 cfs in late Mazch to a peak of about 2 to 3 cfs <br />in eazly May. Flow at the lower weir ceased in eazly June whereas flow at the upper weir continued at <br />less than 0.1 cfs into mid-June. This behavior is typical of other years when flow has been monitored <br />in Windy Gulch prior to the most recent work in Windy Gulch associated with construction of the <br />cutoff walls and streamflow bypass structures in the the 9700 and 9360 waste rock disposal azeas. <br />Water quality samples were taken at the upper and lower weir locations on Mazch 26, April 20 and <br />May 16, 2004. No sample was taken in June because the lower weir was dry. The results of the <br />chemical analyses are shown in Table I. For some constituents, both total and dissolved analyses aze <br />shown. The total analyses generally show higher constituent levels since they include any sediment <br />contained in the water as well as the dissolved constituents. A comparison of the results to the <br />Agricultural Standazds set as water quality goals in the August 23, 2002 plan is included. Average <br />concentrations from 16 samples taken during the 1998 to 2001 period (i.e., prior to the final <br />reclamation activities in Windy Gulch) aze also shown for comparison. <br />