Laserfiche WebLink
08/01/02 THU 15:95 FAS <br />Central protecting Central's wells. The Agreement is binding on C & M's <br />successors and assigns. <br />4. In 2000, Aggregate entered into an Agreement with Central (the "Amended <br />Agreement"). In the Amended Agreement, Aggregate ag~eed to ensure that <br />Central would receive 7 c.f.s. of consumable water during the June 1 -September <br />15 period of well operation, regardless of Aggregate's dewsetering activity- See <br />Paragraph 3. In the event that Central's wells failed, Aggreg~lte agreed to provide <br />the 7 c.f.s. out of its own supplies of fully consumable water. In return, Central <br />withdrew its objection to Aggregate's Division of Minerals anri Geology and Weld <br />County U.S.R. proceedings, and signed a 600 foot spacing waiver that allowed <br />Aggregate to obtain a well permit for the gravel pit. <br />5. Aggregate is currently pumping water from the pit to facilitatt: dry mining of sand <br />and gravel. Aggregate's dewatering activity has caused Cerltral's wells to cease <br />production. Since June 1, 2002 Aggregate has failed to provide 7 c.f.s. of fully <br />consumable water as required by the terms of the Agreement. Aggregate owes <br />Central approximately 97 acre feet of fully consumable waver that should have <br />been delivered during the June 1 -June 7 period. Aggregate's daily obligation, <br />which will continue to accumulate until this matter is resolved, is 13.881 acre feet <br />6. Rathke v. MacFarlane, 648 P.2d 648, 653 (Colo. 1982), states the requirements <br />of a preliminary injunction which include (1) a danger of real, immediate and <br />irreparable injury which may be prevented by injunctive nalief, (2) there is no <br />plain, speedy adequate remedy at law, (3) balance of equities favors the <br />injunction, (4) an injunction should preserve the status quo during the Ume prior <br />to trial on the merits- <br />7. Central faces the prospect of real, immediate and irreparable injury. Gentral <br />provides augmentation water under a State approved 1:emporary substitute <br />supply plan to approximately 1000 member wells. Under the terms of the plan <br />approved by the State Engineer, Central must replace depletions caused by <br />member wells affecting the South Platte River at the time and in the amount of <br />these depletions affect the River. In order to meet its augmentation demand <br />during the irrigation season, Central must draw upon all of the water rights it <br />owns, including the Brighton Well Field. If Central fails to meet the augmentation <br />demand, it is possible that the State Engineer could enter arr administrative order <br />requiring the cessaticn of pumping from one or more crf Central's member <br />irrigation wells. Central's need for water from the well field i3 particularly acute in <br />2002 because of the drought the state is experiencing. <br />8. Central has no plain, speedy adequate reme dy at law. An order requiring <br />cessation of pumping by member wells would cause the loss of growing crops, <br />and would have a ripple effect on the agricultural economy that is difficult to <br />2 <br />l~ 002 <br />F:U(IMtCCWCIBrighton Well FieldV+ggregate SuitlPl Order 020607.doc <br />