PERMFILE50943

• Permit No: M2003037
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 8/27/2003
• Doc Name: Pre-hearing Order
• From: DMG
• To: Parties
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

ITI. ISSUES
Presentations to the Board shall be limited to the following issues. The parties shall limit
presentations to the question of whether the pending application should be approved or denied,
based on the issues stated below.
1. Is the application adequate to determine if the surface and ground water systems will be
affected and to determine potential impacts to the prevailing hydrologic balance? (Rule
6.4.7).
2. Has the Applicant proposed adequate measures to minimize disturbances to groundwater and
surface water as well as the hydrologic balance of the affected land and surrounding azea?
(Rule 3.1.6(1))
3. Has the Applicant proposed an earthem dam? (Rule 3.1.6(2))
4. Has the Applicant proposed measures to effectively control erosion? (Rule 3.1.6(3))
5. Has the Applicant determined whether there will be an impact to ground water quality and if
so, have the requirements of Rule 3.1.7 been met?
6. Has the Applicant proposed a plan to protect topsoil that satisfies the requirements of Rule
3.1.9 and 6.4.5(2)(d)?
7. Will the proposed reclamation plan acheive the fmal land use of cropland? (Rule 3.1.1)
8. Does the Applicant's proposed reclamation plan describe the type of reclamation it plans to
acheive, why it was chosen, the acreage to be reclaimed; and the methods and mechanics of
earthmoving? (Rule 6.4.5(2)(a))
9. Has the Applicant proposed a grading plan that will create a fmal topography that is
appropriate to the fmal land use of cropland? (Rules 3.1.5 and 6.4.6)
10. Has the Applicant proposed a backfilling and grading plan with reasonable timetables that is
consistent with good mining and reclamation procedures? (Rule 3.1.5(4))
11. Has the Applicant proposed a plan to handle and dispose of refuse in a manner that will
control unsightliness ? (Rule 3.1.5(5))
12. Is the proposed financial warranty amount set at a level which reflects the estimated cost of
completing the reclamation plan? (Rules 4.2.1 and 6.4.12)
13. Has the Applicant adequately addressed the requirements of:
Rule 6.4.8 - Wildlife Information
Rule 6.4.10 - Vegetation Information
Rule 6.4.I 1 - Climate
14. Has the Applicant provided an adequate description to satisfy the seeding and fertilization
requirements of Rule 6.4.5(2)(f)(ii) and (iii)?
15. Has the Applicant addressed secondary containment for hazazdous materials and/or waste?
(Rule 3.1.5(11))
IV. WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS
Pursuant to Construction Materials Rule 2.6(2), all parties must exchange witness and exhibits
information as set forth below no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 8, 2003.
Parties must make a list identifying all witnesses that each may call to testify during the hearing.
Identify each witness byname, address, phone number, area of expertise (if any) and subject(s) of
Page 3 of 7