My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO22023
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO22023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:43:10 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/25/2004
Doc Name
NPDES Permit
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Central Appalachia WWTF Water Quality Assessment CO-003 <br />conservative pollutants degrade and sometimes aze created within a receiving stream depending on <br />stream conditions. Amore detailed discussion of the technical analysis for these pazameters is <br />provided in the pages that follow. <br />Pollutants Evaluated <br />The following pazameters were identified by the WQCD as pollutants to be evaluated for this <br />facility: <br />• Metals. <br />During assessment ofthe facility, neazby facilities, and receiving stream water quality, no additional <br />parameters were identified as pollutants of concern. <br />Central Appalachia W WTF: The Central Appalachia W WTF is located in the SW 1/4, Section 21, <br />T7S, R102W; latitude 39° 26' 10", longitude 108° 46' 10"; at 3148 Hwy 139 in Garfield County. The <br />current design capacity of the facility is 0.005 MGD (0.0077 cfs). Wastewater treatment is <br />accomplished using non-aerated lagoons. The technical analyses that follow include assessments of <br />the assimilative capacity based on this design capacity. <br />Nearby Sources <br />An assessment of neazby facilities based on EPA's Permit Compliance System (PCS) database found <br />63 dischazgers in the Garfield County azea. All of the facilities were discharging to another <br />watershed. In addition, several facilities conducted construction-related operations (e.g., sand and <br />gravel or construction dewatering) and thus had no pollutants of concem in common with Central <br />Appalachia Mining, LLCWWTF. The subject facility is listed in Mesa County, even though it is <br />actually in Gazfield County, because the local office address is in Mesa County. As no dischargers <br />dischazge directly or indirectly to the subject tributaries to East Salt Creek, none have the potential <br />for impact and none are summarized <br />Based on available information, there is no indication that non-point sources were a significant <br />source of pollutants of concern. Thus, non-point sources were not considered in this assessment. <br />Due to the in-stream low flow of zero, the assimilative capacities during times of low flow are not <br />affected by nearby contributions. Therefore, modeling neazby facilities in conjunction with Lodestaz <br />W WTF was not necessary. <br />Metals: Metals occur naturally in rock. Earth disturbances, such as mining operations, expose rock <br />to air and water creating a potential for these elements to be present in elevated concentrations. <br />Using the mass-balance equation provided in the beginning of Section IV, the low flows provided in <br />Section III, the background concentrations contained in Section II, and the in-stream standards for <br />metals shown in Section II, assimilative capacities were calculated. The data used and the resulting <br />calculations of the allowable discharge concentrations, Mz, are set forth in Table A-5 for chronic and <br />acute assimilative capacities. <br />Appendix A Page 7 of 9 Draft <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.