Laserfiche WebLink
Apache Canyon cannot be economically flood irrigated at an elevation of 7200 feet <br />while Santistevan Canyon cannot be economically flood irrigated at an elevation of 7240 <br />feet. It would take approximately I mile of ditch construction to irrigate these two <br />canyon bottoms at the specified elevations. The cost for construction of a 1 mile ditch <br />was estimated at $25,000.00. Considering a potential hay production of 1.5 tons/acre <br />(1983 hay production estimate near the Maxwell Mine) and a profit of $20.00/ton this <br />would yield $30.00/acre or $600.00/20 acres in Apache Canyon. A payback period in <br />excess of ten years is considered uneconomic. This project would be paid back in excess <br />of 40 years. <br />These canyons do not contain sufficient subirrigation to sustain agriculturally useful <br />vegetative communities. The dominant vegetative community in the canyon bottoms is a <br />big sagebrush, and cool season and warm season grass mixture. A partiallist of species <br />would include: big needlegrass, 3-awn, little bluestem, western wheatgrass, blue gamma, <br />side oats gamma, big sagebrush and rabbitbrush. This vegetative community is not <br />dependent upon subirrigation. Narrow leaf cottonwood occurs occasionally within this <br />community as well. When present, this tree is found in small groups along the drainage <br />course. If significant source of subsurface water was available these species would have a <br />greater geographic range in these canyons. Much the same as the Purgatoire Valley would <br />have, if left in its natural state. <br />Utilizing the species area concept and dependence on water, it is likely that no <br />significant subsurface aquifers are present in these canyons. Therefore, the potential for <br />irrigation by pumping would be severely limited. <br />Drilling experience in the Raton Basin has shown that in fact these side canyons <br />contain small localized "reservoirs", receiving water from runoff and infiltration. No <br />significant subsurface aquifers in these canyons are expected to occur. <br />In summary, Apache and Santistevan Canyons are not AVF's for the following <br />reasons: there is no regional past or present precedence for irrigating small side canyon <br />drainages. Apache Canyon has not been or is presently irrigated. Only a small portion of <br />the bottom of Santistevan Canyon is irrigated and this is considered part of the <br />Picketwire Valley. It is economically unfeasible to divert Purgatoire River water to these <br />drainages. The areal extent of narrow leaf cottonwood is limited suggesting small <br />localized pockets of alluvial groundwater. <br />It is also WFC's contention there are not significant alluvial aquifers in these <br />canyons, rather isolated occurrences of subsurface water. <br />This subsurface water occurs in localized areas where sufficient colluvium has been <br />deposited. Seasonal runoff and infiltration into this colluvium create small reservoir <br />pockets. Evidence of these deposits include drilling information obtained in similar <br />canyons near Segundo, Colorado and the limited areal extent of narrow-leaf cottonwood in <br />these canyons. <br />