My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE50729
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE50729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
ASH DISPOSAL PLANS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 4.5.6 Potential Impacts <br />There ere no atrenm laid deposits holding a stream within 2 <br />miles of the ash disposal, life-of-mine boundary. Ennis Draw, <br />which lies immediately on the east of the boundary, does not <br />hold a stream. Ennis Draw is a relatively broad, flat, <br />topographic low in which no stream channel is defined. No <br />evidence of a presently existing perennial, ephemeral, or <br />intermittent stream in Ennis Draw has been observed. There is <br />subsurface evidence that a stream once existed in the draw, <br />but these deposits have been covered over by the existing wind <br />blown deposits. As shown in Map 4.6.3 <e), the subsurface <br />water system of Ennis Draw has been effectively isolated from <br />the mining activity presently being conducted adjacent to the <br />draw. There has been none, nor is there anticipated to be, a <br />significant impact to the ground-water levels in this arse. <br />Box Elder Creek is located about 3 miles west of the proposed <br />ash disposal site. At this time, however, it is not <br />anticipated that ash disposal will progress far enough west to <br />effect ground-water flow to Box Elder Creek. <br />Aa explained in the report of hydrologic investigations, the <br />quality of post ash disposal activities on the ground-water is <br />not expected to differ substantially from that which now <br />• exists. (See Water Auality Data, Section 4.5.7, Appendix B, <br />Ash test results and Water Quality, Appendix C). Therefore, <br />neither the quantity nor quality of waters associated with Box <br />Elder Creek or Ennis Draw are expected to be affected. In any <br />case, the discharge through the life-of-mine area is very <br />small. The ground-water discharge through the area was <br />previously estimated to 5.4 ac-ft/yr or only 3 gpm, however, <br />based on observations of the active pit area, this discharge <br />rate through the area may be high. <br />9.5.7 Ground-water Ouelity and Monitoring <br />Since the initiation of the formal groundwater sampling <br />program in January 1982, twenty quarters of sub-surface water <br />quality information has been collected from monitor wells in <br />and around the Keenesburg Mine. This ground-water monitoring <br />program has delineated baseline conditions concerning <br />ground-water movement and quality in and around the active <br />operations area. <br />The results obtained from date collected in the field and from <br />comprehensive water quality analysis indicate that surface and <br />ground-water quality has not been impacted from the natural <br />pre-mine conditions. In addition, mayor ground-water movement <br />patterns have not been influenced or interrupted by mining <br />activities. <br />• <br />-34- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.