Laserfiche WebLink
- CC&11 Go 1 d Mng . Co . ID•9-689-4040 JUN 1~5 20 :28 No .012 P .09 <br />^~1, Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />" ~ A Jdnl Nonlun - Plka Polk Mining CompsnY, Manegw <br />`~(ti/ ~~~~5~/// Operatlong OHIa Engbwood Ofaca <br />~N'.'7L P.O. Box 191, 2755 State Highway 67 5251 DTC Perkwey. Suite 700, Englewood <br />Vietoy Coloratlo 80660 Colaratlo 60117 <br />(719) 86&2877 • FAX (718) 86~321i4 1300) BB9-0700 • FAX (303) 869-0707 <br />June 13, 1995 <br />SENT BY PACSIMILE AND EXPRESS MAIL <br />Mr. Berhan ICeffclew <br />Pavironmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br />1313 Sherman Stmt, Room 215 <br />Denver,: Colorado 80203 <br />Reference: R~onse to Your Letter of June 8. 1995. <br />Dear Mr, Keffelew: <br />In response to your letter of June 8, 1995, received in this office on June 12, we appreciate your <br />acknowledgement of the appropriateness of terminating.the humidity cell tests. With respect to <br />last part of your letter, you state that the overburden has the potential W violate applicable water <br />quality standards for surface water or jeopardise existing or potentiatefuture uses of ground <br />water. Apparently your letter was prepared prior to our meeting of May 28, 1995 in which all <br />in attendance agreed that the concern of the Office about temporary'. modifications of surface <br />water criteria was not justified. Further, this just-now-received letter appears to have been <br />prepared prior to your receipt of our letter dated June 5, 1995 in which we responded to all <br />points made in your letter of May 30, 1995. <br />The use of ground-water in this Mining District is as recharge to surface water. If you have <br />cucaminod the record, there are no wells in the Cripple Creek Mining District. Therefore, and <br />as represented by spring flow arising in Arequa Gulch, and as evidenced by the ground-water <br />quality data that the Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company has and is collecting, the <br />objective is to protect existing quality in a manner that protects surface waters as thgy now exist. <br />The Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company has previously responded to all requests of <br />the Office of Mined Land Reclamation for information regarding the deposition and management <br />of overburden. The Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company has submitted a <br />management plan for that overburden on December 29, 1994 and has not received any <br />documentation from the Office of Mined Land Reclamation that disproves the humidity cell <br />results and the comparison thereof to ambient water quality. Thal December 1994 submission <br />satisfied the applicable permit requirements. It was initially submitted as a Technical Revision <br />but, if my records are correct, was modified at your Office's request such that it may not be <br />considered a technical revision. If the Office is asking that we resubmit our December 29, 1994 <br />management as a Technics[ Revision such that approvals may precede, we wsl! be pleased to do <br />