Laserfiche WebLink
PERIODIC INSPECTION FORN <br />Stockpondc or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Roy Karo <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stoc fond <br />SITE NAME: T-7 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-RO-005 <br />DATE: 09/2B/9B <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 05/12/98 <br />LOCATION: NF.3~cW~ Sec 12 TSN AB7W <br />LOCATION: 7.1 mi _cS of Hayden, Co <br />OWNER'S REP.: _9rad Brown Gen Mqr <br />1. Angle of elope: 2.5:1 upstream, 3:1 downstream Total = 5.5:1 N/A <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment elopes: Yes ~ N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yee No N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes N~ N/A <br /> <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes ~ N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes N® N/A <br />3. Cracks or ecarpe on treat: Yee No N/A <br />4. Cracks or ecarpe on elope: Yes No N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on elope: Yes No N/A <br />6. *Major erosion problems: Yes ~ N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yee ~ N/A <br />6. *Eroeion of toe: Yes ~ N/A <br /> <br />9. *Water impounded against downstream toe: Yee No N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: A~oroximately ~ feet <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: Nn change feet <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yee No N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yee No N/A <br />14. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels: Yes N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yee ~ <br />o N/A <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the apace on the back of this sheet. <br />