My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE50454
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE50454
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:29:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/16/2006
Section_Exhibit Name
4.0 Description of the Environment Page 66-130
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4-83 <br />• Criteria are given for good, fair or poor sources of recon- <br />sttuction material (Table 4.7-1). A good rating means <br />vegetation is relatively easy to establish and maintain, <br />the surface is stable and resists erosion, and the recon- <br />structed soil has good potential productivity. Material <br />rated fair can be vegetated and stabilized by modifying one or <br />more properties. Top dressing with better material or <br />application of soil ammendments may be necessary for satis- <br />factory performance. Material rated poor has such severe <br />problems that revegetation and stabilization is very difficult <br />and costly. Top dressing with better material may be necessary <br />to establish and maintain vegetation (USDA, 1978). <br />• 4.7.5.2 Soil Chemistry and Physical Properties <br />Chemical and physical data for permit area soils were collected <br />to evaluate the soils as reconstruction material for disturbed <br />lands. Soil chemical and physical data from analysis by <br />F & L Labs are reported in the Appendix. SCS Soil Survey <br />Interpretation Records were also used in making the evaluations. <br />Soils were sampled by horizon and analyzed using standard <br />agricultural techniques. The parameters tested were paste <br />pH, electrical conductivityf moisture saturation percentage; <br />soluble sodium,~magnesium ahd calcium; SAR,~organic matter; <br />particle size distribution,~textural class, and boron The <br />techniques used (appendix) are those of USDA Handbook 60 <br />• (1954) and American Society of Agronomy Monograph #9 (Black, <br />1965) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.