Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ALTERNATIVES: The applicant has identified two alternatives to <br />continued mining operations at this site. These alternative <br />include mining in another location and purchasing material from <br />other operators. <br />The material used in the manufacture of concrete and asphalt must <br />meet durability specifications and be economical to transport. <br />Nearby upland areas researched by the company are predominately <br />soft sedimentary rocks unsuitable for the intended uses. <br />Material in and adjacent to the river consists largely of igneous <br />and metamorphic rocks transported from other sources in the <br />drainage basin. This material meets the required specifications; <br />however, a number of adverse impacts are associated with moving <br />to another such site. These impacts include unnecessary new <br />disturbance of other land, longer distances from Telluride (i.e. <br />increased consumer cost), and increased heavy truck traffic along <br />Highway 145 to deliver materials to the existing site for <br />processing. <br />The applicant has also stated that there are no other available <br />suppliers in the area from which to purchase material. <br />Furthermore, the applicant states that purchased materials tend <br />to be undependable and subject to interruption/inconsistency by <br />varying supply, cost, and regulatory actions. <br />An alternative access into the old placer aggregate area exists <br />on a dirt road located east of the county road bridge. The <br />applicant has rejected this as an alternative access to the main <br />clear-span crossing proposed near the shop area based on a <br />nonexisting right-of-entry ownership, conflicting land use for <br />this area approved for development (Lawson Hill), increased <br />impacts to county road 625 road and bridge, and inconvenient and <br />longer haul distance. <br />AREA DESCRIPTION: The project area is located approximately <br />five miles west of Telluride at the confluence of the San Miguel <br />and South Fork rivers. This area is contained in a narrow valley <br />at an elevation of 8,050 feet msl. The drainage basin of the San <br />Miguel River is approximatley 43 square miles with an annual <br />bankfull discharge of approximately 65 cfs. <br />The South Fork River has a larger drainage basin (Illium Valley) <br />and higher bankfull discharge than the San Miguel River. Flows <br />in the South Fork River are somewhat regulated by hydroelectric <br />dams on Trout and Hope Lakes. Riparian communities that exist <br />along the river are dominated by cottonwood trees with willow, <br />alder, and a variety of grasses and forbs in the understory. <br />Recreational use is heavy within the Illium Valley and the Mary E <br />Campground exists on the east bank of the South Fork River near <br />the confluence. The Forest Service has described a loss of <br />3 <br />