My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE50192
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE50192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:51 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:23:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980193
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/24/1978
From
EL PASO CNTY DOT
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • '\ <br />January 2, 1970 <br />Nr. Charlaa Barry, Esq. <br />Attorney's Office <br />E1 Paeo County, Colorado <br />Dear Hr. Berry <br />We have recently received 30 applications for mining and reclamation permits. <br />for the gravel pits operated by EZ Paeo County. Tlie applications aze <br />apparently the county's attempts at compliance with 34-32-101 C.R.S. 1973 <br />ae emended (the Colorndo tdined ).and Reclamation Act). Unfortunately, the <br />applications arc still incomplete, and inadequate. The E1 Paeo applicntiotis <br />wire reviewed by several board members at tl~e December 21 board meeting, <br />and tl~e board has specifically requestod that you be advised of tl~e <br />inedgQsate nature of t1~e applications. <br />The particular deficiencies of tF.e recently eabodttad applications era <br />itemised below. <br />(1) No application face were submitted. On each application it is <br />noted that the application fee ie "unknown due to weather con- <br />~ - ditione." <br />(2) The exhibits were not submitted. or those that ware are not <br />proper. For example. the description in your purchase orders <br />will not suffice ae a legal description of the property. <br />(3) No acreage figures ware submitted for each gravel pit. All <br />the applications note that the affected acreage "would depend <br />on acts of God." The general practice ie to simply eetiaate <br />the total acreage to be affected by the operation. <br />(4) The proposed future land use hen not been identified for any of <br />the gravel pits. Each application notes that "the landowner has <br />not informed E1 Paeo County." The county should simply work out <br />an acceptable land use for the reclaimed land with the landowner. <br />In mast sense, the future use is simply graain4 land or dry land <br />farming. The purpose of this requirement should be obvious -- <br />the reclamation plan should be designed with the future land use <br />in mind. <br />(S~ Only a general map tas submitted with the applications. Amore <br />detailed map should be submitted for each application. <br />(6) The zequieite information about wildlife wan not submitted. The <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife will assist in providing this in- <br />foroation, but it is incumbent upon the applicaafoeo obtain the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.