Laserfiche WebLink
*^' -~_., Cotter C~•~><•.ation <br />• I i <br />- General Office <br />August 5, 1933 <br />D. !" ]D]. IL-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />9]~~'N ES- ALAMEDAi 999 <br />LAKEW000. GOLOI'iADO BOiAe <br /> <br />~.UG 1 0 1983 <br />Mr. .filbert J. Hazle, Director <br />Radiation Control Division Colo~O©rANDq~CLAM,aTr <br />Colorado Department of Health p olNatural ~N <br />4210 East 11th Avenue Resource <br />Denver, CO 80220 <br />RE: P.a;iioactive Materials License No. CO 369-035 <br />Dear Mr. Hazie: <br />This is written to inform the Division of a proposed revision to Item <br />3 in Cotter's April 6, 1983, letter prepared pursuant to License <br />Condition 13.2.5 of the above-captioned license. This revision relaxes <br />to the proposed methodology to be employed to protect the ore and <br />sorter reject pads at the ore sorter from a 100 year flood event. Ttre <br />April 6, 1983, proposal involved raising the elevation of the ore pact <br />approximately six and one half feet. UHOn further evaluation, howevE:r, <br />Cotter has determined that the proposal ''ascribed below and shown on <br />the attached drawing will provide flood protection equally effective <br />as that earlier proposed, will be more cost effective and less disruF~- <br />tive to current operations. <br />specifically, the revised met~iod of flood protection at the ore and <br />sorter reject pads will entail the construction of a wall eight feet <br />in height, which will be constructed of lagging supported by vertical <br />1-beams adjacent to the pad. The design specifications for this wall, <br />described on the attached drawing. will ensure adequate protection <br />from the water force exerted by the 100 year event. <br />The location of the proposed wall is depicted on the attached drawing. <br />P1easF~ note that the previously proposed elevated pad alternative <br />also 's shown on this drawing, but, the final pad elevation for this <br />revised proposal will not be as indicated on the drawing. The final <br />pad e~evation for this proposal will be at existing grade, approximately <br />si.r and one half feet below the elevation. shown on this drawing. <br />