My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE50053
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE50053
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:18:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
3.4 BACKFILLING & GRADING
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
demonstrated that a long-term static safety factor of 1.5 was achieved. <br />The analysis is provided as Appendix 3.9-A. 31'T'S ~85 w <br />final pit is located in approximately the mi dle of Section 36, <br />TSN, R66W. A positive drainage system was created rzomzne<rsege--top-t~ <br />the ridge bottom. Exhibit 3.9-1 was constructed using a computer model <br />developed by Exploration Computer Services, Inc., and was used with the <br />following items considered; the topography of the area before mining, the <br />depth of the overburden, the depth of the coal, the mining methods used, <br />past experience in reclamation and a 338 swell factor for the material. <br />The final postmining contours were achieved by shooting the highwall and <br />grading material from both sides (highwall and spoil) of the pit. This <br />enabled the reclaimed slopes to more closely resemble the premining <br />topography. Grading of the final pit began downslope of the pit area <br />designated for disposal of unsalvageable facilities material. <br />Exhibit 3.9-3 shows a comparison of cross-sections for the final pit <br />area before and after backfilling. The location of the cross-sections are <br />shown on Exhibit 3.9-1. Exhibit 3.9-9 shows a comparison of the premining <br />and postmining slope profiles in the vicinity of the backfilled pit. A <br />review of the profiles indicate that five percent of the premining slope <br />segments equaled or exceeded a 508 slope (individual slope segments were <br />• based on five-foot vertical intervals), particularly along the lowermost <br />portion of the pit area. To ensure long-term stability of the final pit <br />area, the reclaimed pit slope profile does not exceed a maximum of 338. <br />The majority of the reclaimed 338 slope segments have been placed in the <br />upper 250 feet of the profile where the watershed is smallest to minimize <br />the potential for erosion. The remainder of the 338 slopes have been <br />dispersed over the middle section of the final slope profile. <br />Additionally, the stability of the hillslope will be monitored by <br />installing a minimum of three stability monitoring pins. Two of the pin <br />will be installed on the reclaimed spoil approximately 100 ft. south of the <br />highwall edge. The third pin will be placed on undisturbed ground just <br />west (downgradient) of the pit. The pins will be installed along a common <br />east-west line. The pins will be installed once final reclamation <br />activities (i.e., fertilizing, seeding, etc.) have been completed and any <br />influence from freeze/thaw action is absent. The position (east/west <br />coordinates and elevation) of the pins will be monitored quarterly for the <br />first year following installation, and annually thereafter. The timing of <br />the monitoring will be planned so that freeze/thaw action does not <br />influence the position of the pins. Results of the monitoring will be <br />• provided in the Annual Hydrology Report. <br />Renewal-3 3.9-2 June 13, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.