Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> b) Earthquake Magnitude - Data presented by McCalpin (19811, <br />' Menges (1987) and Losh (1982) indicate a likely rupture <br /> of 2 m along the Sangre de Cristo fault. Scarp enhance- <br /> ment due to erosion has likely caused the Kirkham and <br />i Rogers single event offset (2.4 m) to be too Large. <br /> depending on the true fault segment length of the Sangre <br />' de Cristo fault (25 km - 50 km) and using a fault <br /> plane width of 12 km (Machette, 1986), the Likely maximum <br />' future earthquake magnitude is 6.8 to 7.0. As a point <br /> reference, the second Dixie Valley, Nevada eathquake <br />' of 1954 had a rupture segment length of 43 km, an <br /> offset of 2.1 m and a moment magnitude of 6.8. <br />' <br /> EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ANALYSIS <br />' Th <br />hi <br />i <br />id <br />ti <br />f <br />b <br />f <br /> ject o <br />t <br />s sect <br />on is to prov <br />e an es <br />mate o <br />e o <br /> the earthquake hazard for the Battle Mountain Gold site. Several <br />' statistical models have been proposed in the literature to <br /> provide such an estimate for earthquake hazard ( the (probability <br /> of exceeding a given earthquake ground acceleration irr a given <br /> period of years), but most of these models require a relativly <br />' complete catalogue of historical seismicity. No earth<)uakes, <br /> however, have occurred in San Luis Valley during recorded <br /> history; in fact during a microearthquake study of thce Valley <br /> Keller and Adams (1976) were able to record only one r~icro- <br /> earthquake in eight days of recording, a remarkably low <br />' number when compared, for example, with the Intermountain <br /> Seismic Belt in Utah. <br /> A probability estimate can be obtained using the recurrence <br /> time as presented previously in Glass (1988). This re:;ults in <br />' a probability of experiencing a fault rupture within t:he <br /> next 100 years (assumed mine exposure time) of between 0.5 <br /> percent and 2.0 percent. As pointed out in Glass (1988), <br /> however, this approach assumes temporal independence of the <br /> earthquake process. In other words, it wouldn't matter whether <br /> <br /> <br /> 12 <br />f J <br />