Laserfiche WebLink
i 1 <br />' In a comprehensive study of the La Jencia fault zone <br />f <br />N <br />M <br />i <br />M <br />h <br />(1986) d <br /> Socorro, <br />ew <br />ex <br />co, <br />ac <br />ette <br />ocuments as <br />west o <br /> many as six segments on the 35 km long fault with a recurrence <br />' interval between 6,000 and 3,000 years. Machette's analysis <br /> illuminates numerous parallels between the La Jencia Eault <br /> zone and the Sangre de Cristo fault zone, including the apparent <br /> reactivation o£ a relatively sluggish tectonic mountain front <br />' in the Holocene. <br /> Figures 2 and 3 present a compilation of the foregoing <br /> information to show trends within the Rio Grande Rift. <br /> Although the data are sparse some trends do appear. For <br /> example, the deformation rate (Figure 3, open circlesi over <br />' the entire rift appears relatively constant along the length <br /> of the Rio Grande Rift. As the rift widens to the south, <br /> however, deformation is distributed over more faults, decreasing <br /> the deformation rate on individual fault segments (Figure 3, <br />' closed circles). As the rift widens and the ratio of c^xtension <br /> to uplift increases to the south, the return period decreases <br />t (Figure 2, bars), fault segmentation increases (length of <br /> single event scarps decrease, Figure 2, triangles) an<I the <br />~ maximum Likely earthquake magnitude per event decreas<zs (Figure <br />' 3, crosses). Figure 2 also indicates that a fault segmentation <br /> for the Sangre de Cristo fault of 25 km appears compatible <br />' with single event fault segmentation results south of the study <br /> are a, as suggested by McCalpin's data, presented in Figure 1 <br />' above. <br /> In way of summary, the published data support thc~ following <br />' fault rupture potential for San Luis Valley: <br />bl <br />D <br />d i <br />T <br />hl <br />) <br /> e .. roug <br />ata presente <br />n <br />a <br />y <br />a <br />Rupture Recurrence - <br /> suggest a 25% chance that the fault rupture recurrence <br />' is less than 10,000 years, a 50% chance that i_t is Less <br /> than 20,000 years, a 75% chance that it is less than <br />' 40,000 years and a 99+% chance that the fault rupture <br /> recurrence is less than 100,000 years. It has been <br />' 1,940 to 4,715 years since the Last fault rupture on <br /> the San Luis fault segment adjacent to the site. <br /> <br />' 9 <br />