My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO21363
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO21363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:42:53 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:15:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/10/1998
Doc Name
Response Letter to DMG Letter dated 1/12/98
From
COLOWYO COAL CO LP
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
DMR’s
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"All of Colowyo' s ponds aze currently operated as <br />containment ponds. Such ponds shall be considered to <br />have only manual dewatering capability and relief under the <br />alternate limitations provision shall be available to the <br />extent required to regain the necessary IO-year, 24-hour <br />capacity in such ponds. For any ponds that Colowyo may <br />operate in the future as treatment ponds, consistent with the <br />CDMG design criteria, any manual dewatering of such <br />treatment ponds must meet primary dischazge limitations." <br />Please refer to the GENERAL COMMENTS section of the letter for a discussion <br />of the present and future operation of Colowyo's sediment control ponds. The <br />CDMG has copies of all of Colowyo's hydrological modeling and the CDMG is <br />encouraged to review each modeling effort. Colowyo would be pleased to review <br />pond hydrology/sedimentology models with the CDMG. <br />7. Colowyo is not contending here that water pumped from coal production pits <br />should be entitled to the Alternate Limitations. It is important to note, however, <br />that this is because of the control the operator has over the pumping, not the <br />quality of the water. As Colowyo demonstrated in its March 6, 1996 letter to <br />WQCD (letter from Colowyo's counsel D. Kennedy to WQCD), surface runoff <br />that comes into contact with the pit (the source of Colowyo's pit pumped water) <br />remains surface runoff for purposes of discharge permitting, and is entitled to be <br />permitted under the general discharge permit for coal mining operations. Surface <br />runoff pumped from the pit poses no additional water quality concerns than other <br />surface runoff at mining operations. <br />The issue in the draft permit CO-0045161 is how to ensure that gravity drained <br />surface runoff is entitled to the Alternate Limitations, even when it has been <br />combined with pit pumped water in a sediment pond. WQCD's draft permit <br />would allow dischazges from sediment control ponds to be subject to the Alternate <br />Limitations when it can be shown that the majority of the discharge is from <br />gravity drained surface runoff. In Colowyo's comments, dated September 30, <br />1997, on the draft permit, Colowyo proposed that the major source language be <br />deleted and, instead, that one way for Colowyo to demonstrate that surface runoff <br />caused the exceedance of the Primary Limitations (and not the pit pumped water), <br />prior to dischazge into the sediment pond is to sample the pit pumped water to <br />ensure it meets the Primary Effluent Limitations. Colowyo believes this addresses <br />any concern either WQCD or CDMG might have with the dischazge of pit <br />pumped water and its entitlement to use the Alternate Limitations for otherwise <br />qualifying dischares that have been combined with pit pumped water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.