My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49970
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49970
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:45 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:15:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/26/1999
Doc Name
TR 2 TO APPLICATION GROUNDWATER & SURFACE WATER MONITORING PLAN
From
AMERICAN SODA
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 22, 1999 • • Page S <br />four existing wells located outside of the 0-5 yeaz panel, and the six existing wells located within <br />the limits ofthe 0-5 year panel. A summary of the Yankee Gulch site monitoring wells included in <br />the proposed groundwater monitoring plan is presented in Table 1. <br />The monitoring wells are grouped together to provide four nested or co-located monitoring <br />locations for the alluvium, Uinta Formation, A Groove, B Groove, and Dissolution Surface. This <br />network will provide nested or co-located installations for two down-gradient, one up-gradient, and <br />two cross-gradient locations for the first mining panel. <br />The monitoring well layout assumes a groundwater flow direction in the Upper and Lower <br />Aquifers of southwest to northeast. This trend is in accordance with regional groundwater data <br />(Weeks' et al. 1974). Site-specific data from the Upper Aquifer suggests the flow direction is <br />roughly west to east. Therefore, positions of the up-gradient and down-gradient wells, relative to <br />groundwater flow direction, are based on an averaged flow direction ofN65°E. The monitoring well <br />layout is shown on Figure 1. <br />1.2.1 Multiple-Completion Monrtoring We//s (lo be constructed) <br />Three multiple-completion monitoring wells are proposed. The well designated 21-3 will <br />be located down-gradient of the first-phase mine panel and will have four completion zones. <br />Another well, designated 29-4, will be located up-gradient of the first-phase mine panel and will <br />have three completion zones. There will not be a Dissolution Surface completion in 29-4 because <br />it is adjacent to 29-2, which is completed at the Dissolution Surface. The third multiple-completion <br />monitoring well, designated 21-4, will be located inside the northeast boundary of the first-phase <br />mine panel which isdown-gradient ofthe assumed flow directions. Monitoring well 21-4 will have <br />four completion zones, as detailed in Section 1. This layout provides for up-gradient, down-gradient, <br />and cross-gradient groundwater monitoring, according to all published and site-specific data. <br />The multiple-completion monitoring wells will be constructed in large-diameter boreholes <br />to allow a grout mixture to flow freely and fully seal the borehole between the completion zones. <br />All well construction materials (sand, bentonite, and grout) will be placed from the bottom of the <br />borehole by the tremmie method. Each completion will be constructed of 2-inch-diameter, <br />'Weeks, J.B., G. H. Leavesley, F. A. Welder, and G. J. Saulnier, Jr. (1974). "Simulated <br />Effects of Oil-Shale Development on the Hydrology of Piceance Basin, Colorado," USGS <br />Professional Paper 908, 84 p. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.