My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49845
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:42 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:13:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992049
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/10/1992
From
DOW
To
KEN MILLER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N - - r III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DIVISION OF WILDLIFE <br />.N EOU~L ORRORTUNiTy EMVLOYER <br />Perry D. Olson, Director <br />6060 6roatlwey <br />Denver, Coloratlo 60276 <br />Telepnone: 1303) 297-1792 <br />Ken Miller <br />District Wildlife Manager <br />P.O. Box 57 <br />Ridgway, CO. 81432 <br />Thomas A. Schreiner <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined land Reclamation Division <br />Dear Mr. Schreiner, <br />• <br />REFER TO <br />For ~ldlife- <br />ForPeople <br />June 10, 1992 <br />I am writing in regard to the Peck Gravel Pit, File No. M-92-049, which was approved <br />with conditions. Stipulation No. 4 was that mining operations must be conducted in <br />a manner that is canpatible with and enhances local populations of wildlife. The <br />operator will submit a Colorado Division of Wildlife statement within 60 days of <br />permit approval and will implement recommendations, where feasible. <br />This mine is not situated- in a sensitive wildlife area and will not have any adverse <br />effects on local wildlife populations. I understand that no trees will be removed <br />which would have been my recommendation for terrestrial wildlfe. I also understand <br />that no mining will be done in the river. The river is not a fishery in that area, <br />but DCW is concerned about downstream siltation. Since there is no possibility of <br />that, i have no recommendation there either. <br />There are local populations of deer and elk especially in the winter. I can't see <br />the operation affecting those. The area is full of roads and houses now and pets <br />seem to be the largest threat to wildlife. <br />I have no recommendation concerning wildlife for the Peck Pit. There are no unusual <br />or special circumstances that would be a concern to wildlife populations. <br />Thank you. <br />Sincerely, <br />/f.~~w ///~GViD <br />Ken Miller <br />cc: Mike McLain <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Hamlet J. Barry, Executive Director <br />WILDLIFE COMMISSION, William R. Hegberg, Chairman .Dennis Luttrell, Vice Chairman . Eldpn W. Cooper. Secretary <br />Felix Chavez. Member .Rebecca L. Frank Member .Louis F. Swiri. Member .George van Denaerg. Member • Larry M Wrignt. Member <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.