Laserfiche WebLink
~--- <br />RE: MEh1PHIS~ FILE N:M-97-084 ~ Page 2 <br /><lo pyrite overall wiCh no other sulfide <br />~ minerals observed <br />The entire area to the east of the proposed operation is a <br />center of volcanic intrusive activity, the "BLOWOUT". This area is <br />intensely altered and mineralized, with naturally ocCUring alteration <br />products such as limonite, hematite, kaolinite, alunite, jarosite, <br />etc. The entire Blowout area is yellow-ochre in color and contains a <br />defined copper-molybdenum mineral deposit together with skarn-type <br />base and precious-metal mineralization. The waste rock-alluvium <br />contains a small amount of this type of material, together with an <br />abundance of the adjoining sedimentary arkose of the Permian Cutler <br />formation. <br />In regards to your question about acid generating potential, if <br />the material that is to be removed had a high AGP, there would be <br />indications of such within and around the base of the alluvium, since <br />this material has existed in this location at least 50 years and <br />possibly more than 100 years. The vegetation growing on and around <br />this material shows no signs of being affected by low pH or heavy <br />metals. <br />This project is not one of mining massive sulfides and creating <br />waste rock piles that at some future date, through oxidation, may <br />create acid conditions and liberate toxic metals. This is a project <br />of removing and using existing unconsolidated material, that has no <br />indications of being harmful to man or the environment. This <br />material will be used for fill or road base in other parts of the <br />county, similarly to the material in Skyrocket Creek, which has <br />continually been used for the past many decades by the City of Ouray, <br />Ouray County, CDOT and private individuals . <br />Exhibit B - Site Description/Location Map <br />The attached copy of a portion of the Ouray 7.5" Quadrangle, <br />shows the location of the proposed site together with the topography <br />to the east of this area. As shown, the intermittant drainage <br />extends only to the "bench" or flat area to the east. There are no <br />basins or extensive slopes which would provide a larger source for <br />potential storm discharges. The area that influences this drainage <br />is from the above-mentioned bench, west to the flat where the <br />proposed excavation is to be conducted. Within this drainage is the <br />Memphis Dike, along which prospecting and mining has been conducted <br />since the late 1800'x. This is a possible source of some of the <br />mineralized material that is described above. <br />Exhibit C - Mining Plan <br />Your observations, both in review of the application and in the <br />field regarding the potential of an unstable highwall being created <br />by removing all of the material below the present drainage, is very <br />well taken. Based upon your suggestion, it is proposed to expand the <br />permit boundary to the east to include the drainage area, so that the <br />additional unconsolidated material can be removed and stabilized <br />during the mining process. It is proposed to remove the <br />unconsolidated material down to bedrock, and allow the natural side <br />slopes to remain as cliff faces. It is difficult to predict the <br />