My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49711
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:36 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:09:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005066
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/6/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mc Jeff Keller <br />February 28, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />wells have perforations in the Laramie-Fox Hills but aze cemented from the top of the aquifer all the. <br />way to ground surface. Finally, the static water level in the Wilcox and Hawthorne wells is reported <br />as 315-feet and 540-feet, respectively. <br />The Reed well pernut file is somewhat confusing in that there appears to have been an <br />original intent to drill the well to a shallow depth but correspondence in the pemut states that no <br />water was encountered down to at least 60-feet (some 50-feet, at least, below the gravels in the <br />Phase I azea). in response, there was a request made to the State to allow drilling down to 800-feet <br />and into the Lazamie-Fox Hills, which request was granted. The permit file records following this. <br />approval instead indicate that the well was completed to a depth of 170-feet. This would likely <br />place the completion in the upper Arapahoe formation in contradiction to the permit approval <br />conditions. The static water level is reported as 28-feet. <br />The data from all three of these wells cleazly prove that the wells aze producing from <br />bedrock aquifers that aze not and cannot be in hydraulic connection with the minimally saturated <br />gravels that will be dewatered and mined at the proposed Phase I pit. With respect to the Wilcox <br />and Hawthorne wells in particular, there is some 600-feet plus of other bedrock materials sepazating <br />the producing zones of the wells from the gravels. The static water level data indicates a sepazation <br />of between 315- and 540-feet between the water level in the producing aquifer and the water level <br />in the saturated gravels. With such separation there can be no connection hydraulically. Further, <br />we note that the nontributary designation for the bedrock aquifers means, by definition, that there is <br />no connection between the aquifer and the surface stream-alluvial systems. <br />The Kranz well appeazs, as noted above, to be an unregistered well and there is thus no <br />completion data available. However, it is our opinion that the well has to be producing from one of <br />the bedrock aquifers, as is the case with the other three wells. The alluvial aquifer that is comprised <br />of the saturated gravels pinches out just west of the Phase I area and it is seen by the test boring data <br />that there is little to no saturation at the west edge of the proposed Phase I area that would be able to <br />reliably support pumping by a well. <br />It is thus our conclusion that the wells supplying the homes to the west of County Road 23 <br />are not hydraulically connected to the saturated gravels and cannot be impacted by the dewatering <br />operations that will occur at the Phase I mine. <br />Please let us know if you have any questions concerning this letter or our investigations into <br />the neighboring wells. <br /> <br />-~a~riiir ~~ <br />Vice President <br />cc: Mr. Paul Banks <br />Martin and Wood Water Consultants, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.