My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO21261
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO21261
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:42:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:07:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
1/3/2002
Doc Name
REPORTED DMR VIOLATION OUTFALL 002A
From
BRIAN A WATTERSON
To
WQCD
Permit Index Doc Type
DMR’s
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />RECEIVED <br />January 2, 2001 JAN 0 3 2002 <br />Division of Minerals 8 GeolxJy <br />Ms. Carla J. Leril:ey <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and Enviromnen[ <br />Water Quality Control Division -Permits and Enforcement <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive South <br />Denver, Colorado 80222-1530 <br />Subject: Permit No. CO-0042161, Reported Db1R Violation - Oulfall 002A <br />Dear Ms. Lenkey: <br />I received your telephone message this morning regarding the subject violation, and <br />reviewed the permit again, finding section iv, Percentage Removal Requirements (BODs <br />Limitations) under Part I, Page 4, of the Perniit. My understanding of the reporting <br />requirements, as discussed in my letter of December 18, 2001 was in enor. <br />The subject Outfall did not discharge in July or August, but only for the last two weeks in <br />September, allowing one required BODs (mg/1) sample to be collected and analyzed that <br />month, however I was unfamiliar with the associated reporting requirements for BODs <br />Removal %. An erroneous value was inadvertently entered under the % removal <br />parameter on flee third quarter DMR. Minimum and average values reported under 300I <br />for the third quarter were also in error. After running the calculations, the BODs <br />Removal % for the one month (September) the subject Outfall discharged was 98.69%, <br />using the average influent concentrations for that same month. Attached are two copies <br />of the corrected DMRs for 002A and 300I. These should supercede the previous <br />submittals. <br />I again apologize for not having caught this error during the third Quarter DMR <br />preparation. Thank you for your time. If there are questions, please contact me directly <br />at (970) 870-2750. <br />Sincerely, <br />a ~. ~~ <br />Brian A. Watterson, <br />Environmental Geologist <br />cc: DMG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.