Laserfiche WebLink
After the road was constructed, topsoil was placed in a thin veneer on the <br />• face of cutslopes to serve as a rooting medium for establishing vegetation and <br />were hydromulched and seeded in 1977, with seed augmentation occurring in 1978. <br />Several slopes, especially those facing east, exhibited evidence of surficial <br />slumps or downhill creep; and, upon examination, these features occurred along <br />the topsoil/cutslope interface and were not considered evidence of deep-seated <br />instability (Ertec, 1981 - report on file with CMLRD). <br />On April 26, 1980, a landslide occurred in an area adjacent to a gas pipe- <br />line (referred to as the Gas Line Slide) (Map 8). CMLRD requested Sun Coal <br />Company to conduct a study (Ertec, 1982 and 1983) to evaluate the cause of the <br />landslide and, if necessary, recommend and adopt appropriate measures to main- <br />tain road corridor stability. During the sunnier of 1981, extensive surveys were <br />conducted to obtain haul road information. A controlled areal survey was con- <br />• ducted to provide information related to shop facilities, road grades, culvert, <br />runout, ditch, and sediment trap locations. Map 8, with a two-foot contour <br />interval at a 1 inch equals 100 feet, was generated to provide an adequate base <br />to conduct geotechnical, geological, and hydrogeological studies. <br />According to a study conducted by Ertec in 1982-1983, the gas line slide <br />area appeared to be a rotational type slope failure caused by many factors -- <br />factors related to natural conditions, the landowner's oil drilling and grading <br />activities, and gas pipeline and mining construction and maintenance activities. <br />Sun Coal Company, in an effort to stabilize the slide area, routed water <br />from the rotational slip head scarp, installed larger inside road cut ditches, <br />and graded and reclaimed the slide area. <br />. In addition to identifying this area, three other areas exhibited potential <br /> stability concerns. These areas are identified on Map 8 and are located above <br />- 172 - (Rev. 5/86) <br />