My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49643
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:35 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:07:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/4/2004
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Revegetation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cover in reclaimed areas generally runs 15 percent or greater (see 1987, 1988, 1989 Seneca II <br />Revegetation Monitoring Reportsl. The cover standard detailed above also solves the problem <br />of a cover standard derived from only the herbaceous component of a reference area heavily <br />dominated by woody vegetation which is too low, or a standard derived from the same <br />reference area using herbaceous and woody vegetation cover combined, which is unreasonably <br />high. <br />Revegetation success for cover in the reclaimed portions of Dry Creek will be evaluated by <br />comparing the premining baseline vegetation cover value for the Dry Creek mesic drainage type <br />to the cover in the revegetated areas along Dry Creek. Designated mesic drainage reclamation <br />areas in the II-W South Extension area will be evaluated by comparing the premining baseline <br />vegetation cover values for these areas to the cover in the revegetated mesic drainage portion <br />in the II-W South Extension area. The revegetated area shall be considered acceptable if they <br />are not less than 90 percent of the baseline cover value within the applicable reference area <br />with 90 percent statistical confidence. This method of comparison will be used because of the <br />small premining acreage of mesic drainage along Dry Creek and the limited area of reclaimed <br />drainage within the II-W South Extension area. <br />40b Revised 1 /99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.