My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49643
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:35 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:07:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/4/2004
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 22 Revegetation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The following plan/technique for tree and shrub reestablishment was suggested by Dr. David Buckner <br />and is directed toward the successful establishment of individual aspen trees in select reclamation <br />locations for the purpose of facilitating the eventual clonal spread of those aspen individuals and the <br />return of that vegetation type to the reclaimed landscapes. Like many aspects of the return of woody <br />plants to reclaimed areas in Routt and Moffat Counties, the reestablishment of aspen is a goal that, at <br />best, will be achieved over the long term. Like certain of the other prominent woody species in the pre- <br />mining landscapes (especially Gambel's oak) the heart of the presence of aspen in apre-mining <br />landscape is the immense bulk of the underground parts of the individual clones. The progression from <br />time zero on a geologically "renewed° landscape to mature aspen clones has never been observed over <br />its full course and so no one really knows what the conditions of establishment and the rates of growth <br />toward the eventual mature clone are. All SCC can do is provide the setting in which we think the tree <br />or shrub in question may eventually, given favorable climatic conditions, lead to expanding clonal <br />growth. In the short term, we need to give the "mother -plants" that we seek to establish, acos[- <br />efficient but effective boost and adequate protection from as many as possible of the environmental <br />stresses that we know exist in reclaimed areas. <br />Suitable re-establishment sites would be those that are concave (i.e. "low-lying"1 and can be expected <br />to accumulate moisture las well as soil) in the pattern typical of nearly all terrestrial landscapes. It is <br />proposed to endow these select sites with "over-thickened" topsoil, as is so often the nature of natural <br />locations of vigorous aspen growth. Of course "low-lying" sites along drainages with extensive <br />watershed above are probably not good candidates because of the risk of soil loss. Places in drainage <br />headwaters with gentle side slopes have been selected. <br />It is believed that the best approach here would be to use '/, to 1 y, inch caliper aspen and plant them <br />very deep, that is place the root ball as it comes from the nursery at a depth of five to six feet. The <br />intent of this seeming inappropdately deep planting is to place the roots in contact with moisture that is <br />stable and predictable. Members of the genus Popu/us have the capacity to root adventitiously <br />following deep burial. Through their evolution, this has not been a response to deep planting but rather <br />the arrival of deep deposits of soil, gravel or sand around them during flood events. Dr. Buckner has <br />used this technique with narrowleaf cottonwood (Popu/us angustifo/ia) with great success. <br />These would be watered well at the time of planting and three or four times during the first growing <br />season. Four square yards of landscape fabric would be placed around the base of each tree and <br />wood chips placed on top of that. Cages of 2" x 4" 12 gauge welded wire 72 inches tall would be <br />placed around each and anchored with three t-posts <br />The Division discussed this proposed "mother plant" concept with Dr. Wayne Shepperd of the U.S. <br />Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Dr. Shepperd is a recognized authority on aspen <br />regeneration and management, and was author or co-author of the papers referenced in the initial <br />adequacy letter. Dr. Shepperd stated that he felt the primary limiting factors with respect to <br />establishing aspen plantings on mined areas were insufficient moisture for establishment and excessive <br />browsing. He indicated that it was almost certainly the case that most native aspen cones were <br />PR03 23 Revised 11/02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.