HYDRO21233

• Permit No: C1980005
• IBM Index Class Name: Hydrology
• Doc Date: 12/12/1991
• Doc Name: 4th Qtr 1991 Inspections
• From: PEABODY COAL CO
• To: MLRD
• Permit Index Doc Type: SEDIMENT POND INSPECTIONS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM
Water, Sediment, or Slurry Impoundments
INSPECTOR'S NAME: Ron Gehrke DATE: 11/21/91
NPDES I.D. NO.: -
FAC ILITY CONFIGU Incised Pond DATE LAST INSPECTION: 08/01/91
SIT E NAME: Wad e Im oundment #002 LOCATION: N~/~ NE'/< Sec. 34 T6N R87W
MIN E NAME: eneca one ea o y oa o LOCATION: mi. o a y en,
MIN E I.D. N .: ermit - - OWNER'S R .: Scott Williams. Suot
Circle or write in appropriate response
1. Foundation preparation (removal of vegetation, stumps, topsoil): _ Yes No
2. Lift thickness: in. /A
3. Compaction according to approved plan: Yes No N/
4. Burning (specify extent and location): Yes No
5. Angle of slope: upstream, downstream Total = _ N/A
6. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume)
From underdrain pipes: Yes No
At isolated points on em an ment s opes: Yes No
At natural hillside: Yes N/A
Over widespread areas: Yes ~
o N
From downstream foundation area: Yes o N
"Boils" beneath stream or ponded wa er: Yes to N/A
7. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes No /A
8. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes No
9. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes No /A
10. *Major erosion problems: Yes No N/A
11. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: es No N/A
12. *Erosion of toe: Yes No N/,4
13. *Water impounded against toe: Yes No N A
14. Existing embankment freeboard: N/A feet
15. Increase X Decrease in water level: 1-0 feet
16. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes No N/A
17. Visible sumps or sinkholes in slurry surface: Yes No N/A
18. *Clogging
Spillway channels and pipes: Yes ©o N/A
Decant system: Yes No 1~A~
Diversion ditches: Yes N~ iJ/A
19. *Cracking or crushing of pipes
Spillway pipes: Yes No N A
Decant system: Yes No A
20. Trash racks clear and in place: Yes No 1/~
*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to
the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse condi-
tions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, etc.)
in the space on the back of this sheet.