Laserfiche WebLink
I~ <br />'1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />• • <br />Order # 98-10-179 Colorado State Unversity <br />ANALYTICA, INC. CASE NARRATIVE <br />Samples were prepared and analyzed according to methods outlined in the <br />following references: <br />o Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA 600/4-79-020, <br />March 1983. <br />o Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants, <br />40 CFR, Part 136, 7-1-97 Edition. <br />o Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, USEPA SW-846, Third Edition, <br />Revision 4, January 1996. <br />o Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and wastewater, 17th Edition, <br />1989. <br />All analyses meet quality assurance objectives. <br />The analyst missed the 354.1 (nitrite) holding time so the EPA method 300 method <br />was used in order to provide good data to the client. <br />Page 2 <br />