My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49472
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49472
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:51:23 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:03:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002122
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/27/2003
Doc Name
Objection Letter
From
Petersen & Fonda P.C.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAR-25-2003 TUE 09;22 RM PETERSEN & FONDA, PC <br />3~14~77; 1:7]PM~HYOP(75PHE17E <br />-- w <br />719 542 8515 <br />ao~+aazwale <br />1,... „~. i•.~ t~,. <br />March 14, 2003 <br />Mr. Van A. Truan <br />Chief <br />Southern Colorado Regulatory Office <br />Albuquerque District, Corps of Engineers <br />Department of the Army <br />720 North Main Street, Suite 205 <br />Pueblo, Colorado 8]003-3046 <br />Re: Action No. 2002 00599 <br />Dear Mr. Truaa; <br />Thanks very much for the pleasant, helpful and informative meeting we had in your <br />office on March 12, 2003. 1 am writing this loner in accordance with your request during <br />that discussion <br />Ttt that meeting, we discussed the letter (dated September' 16, 2002) written by the <br />SouthetTt Colorado Regulatory Office in connection with the above-mentioned Action <br />Number (2002 00599) and the associated site visit. During our discussion, it became <br />apparent that there may have been some tnisundetatanding about the location and extent <br />of the proposed Boyer Gravel Pit site (the suhject of the letter and Aeld visit.) <br />Conacqucatly, you indicated shat it would be appropriate for Corps of Engineers staff to <br />visit the site again, so that the presence of waters of the United States and the related <br />ideati&cation of Corps of Engineers jurisdictional waters and wetlands over the complete <br />site could be re-evaluated. As you oxplaincd, this is a key elem~tt in the determination <br />of potential permit requirements under 5cction 404 of the Clean Water Act. <br />I would be grateful if you could send rrxe your Endings and copies of any correspondcaee <br />and documentation related to the upcoming site visit and site evaluation. <br />Than(cs, again, for your help in this matter. <br />Sincerely, <br />~.,~ai~ <br />lohn H, Gcrstle <br />)Iydrosphere Resource Consultants, Inc, <br />03 <br />n v <br />.. ... _... ".,. . •".~ ~~~ • ~.';- ,: " .~~ ..'._ , ~ 1nlyFe.~ •ar.".t1 •142d1~91q <br />u~r'o p••..•.: ., • ~ ,.~. ~rv ,: g•.~ ~~;•t,•I~In~(:`~:~ 1'4Tti•Ti lr :i •~ti., • .rr1,L ~n R-a:i:;~l • Tk'ICF.1:: 13bfI R3.'i44nq <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.