My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49399
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49399
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:51:19 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:00:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
m2004044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/4/2004
Doc Name
Groundwater Model
From
Tetra Tech RMC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1: Aquifer Tests Conducted Near Tucson South Mine (Wilson, 1965) <br /> Well Depth Pumping Rate Hydraulic <br />Well Location Geologic Unit Ut) (8Pm) Conductivity <br /> da ) <br />T1S, R67W, Sea 35 Va1leyFill 39 360 307 <br />4 miles SW of site De osits <br />T1S, R66W, Sec. 30 Valley Fill 35 140 334 <br />3 miles SE of site De osits ( ) <br />T1N, R66W, Sec. 8 Valley Fill 36 540 561 <br />6 miles NE of site De osits <br />T1N, R66W, Sec. 18 Valley Fill 50 1020 602 <br />5 miles NE of site De osits <br />T1N, R66W, Sec. 19 Valley Fill 23 450 668 <br />4 miles NE of site De osits ( ) <br />T1N, R66W, Sec. 30 Valley Fill 40 610 695 <br />3 miles NE of site De osits ( ) <br />T1N, R67W, Sec. 13 Valley Fill 38 575 762 <br />5 miles N of site Deposits (Qp) <br />A pump test was conducted at the east end of the site, near the South Platte River, in 2004 by Bishop- <br />Brogden Associates. Reportedly, the hydraulic conductivity in the clean sand and gravel was 1700 feet <br />per day at a pumping rate of 565 gpm. The well was approximately 30 feet deep. Note that the <br />hydraulic conductivity was quite high because was tested only in the sand and gravel zone. The <br />hydraulic conductivity used in the model reflects an average value for the entire alluvial cross section <br />(overburden, mud lens, sand and gravel) at every location. <br />No information was available in Wilson (1965) for the hydraulic conductivity of terrace deposits (Qb) <br />and the wind-blown deposits (Qes) west of the site. However, other literature sources report that <br />hydraulic conductivity values of alluvium in northeastern Colorado may range from 20 to 750 feet per <br />day (Hershey and Schneider, 1972). Therefore, the range of hydraulic conductivities for the three <br />geologic units in the area of the reservoir are expected to be from 20 to 1700 feet per day. The hydraulic <br />conductivity of the terrace deposits is expected to be similar to the valley fill deposits, as the percentage <br />of gravel, sand and silt are similar. The wind-blown deposits are expected to have a lower hydraulic <br />conductivity because they consist primarily of fine to medium sand. <br />In the western part of the model, the bedrock rises, reducing the saturated thickness of the alluvium. To <br />simulate this, the hydraulic conductivity was adjusted based on the ratio of alluvium thickness to the <br />height of the cell. For example, a cell that was vertically half alluvium and half bedrock would have a <br />hydraulic conductivity of 200 feet per day instead of the 400 feet per day used in the cells that consisted <br />entirely of alluvium. <br />Based on experience and literature values, the Specific Yield of the alluvial aquifer was assumed to be <br />0.2 throughout the domain. <br />2.4 Recharge <br />Recharge was applied in the model to account for rainfall and snow melt that infiltrates into the ground <br />and reaches the water table. Precipitation recharge in north-central Colorado has been reported to be <br />about five percent of the total precipitation (RMC, 1991). This translates into an annual recharge rate of <br />- 4 - August 2004 <br />I V 9i9 019\TS GW Model\TS Report\Tucrton SouN Rq Draft doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.