My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49068
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:51:00 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:52:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/7/2006
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Letter of 08/01/06
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grand River Park Project, M-2006.046 <br />Response to Adequacy Letter of August i, 2006 <br />6 September 2006 <br />Page 8 <br />12. Rule 6.4.5(2)(t)(v) requires a description of the anticipated minimum depth <br />or range of depths for those areas where topsoil will be replaced. The <br />applicant has indicated that at least four inches of topsoil will be provided <br />in the reclamation condition however, the applicant should be aware that <br />the Division requires a minimum depth of topsoil replacement of six <br />inches. Please commit to topsoil replacement of this minimum depth. <br />Rule 6.4.5(2)(f) contains requirements to describe various features of the <br />reclamation plan in Exhibit E. The applicant has complied with the requirement <br />of subparagraph (v), concerning a description of the depth of topsoil <br />replacement. Rule 6.4.5 does not contain a requirement of 6-inch minimum <br />topsoil replacement, nor does any other Rule. In fact, Rule 6.4.5(1) states that <br />applicants are encouraged to allow for flexibility in their plans rather than <br />committing to specific figures. <br />As noted in the application (page 2), the site is dominated by "extremely rocky <br />soils, with some places exposed to alluvial sand and gravel and no overlying <br />topsoil layer." In the vicinity of Interstate 70, it is believed that this condition may <br />be a result of construction of the embankment for the highway and associated <br />features, involving the use of the subject site as a source for borrow material. <br />However, regardless of cause, even with extremely shallow topsoil in large <br />areas, the existing condition of the site demonstrates that there is still present <br />throughout a suitable plant growth medium for grasses, shrubs, and trees. <br />As a general performance standard, following from Rule 3 and the performance <br />warranty attaching to a proposed Reclamation Plan {see Rule 4.17.1{1)), the <br />plant growth medium in reclaimed condition must be sufficient in quantity and <br />quality to sustain vegetation. Based on existing conditions, it is evident that the <br />existing matrix of soils and substrate at the subject site provides a suitable plant <br />growth medium, even if the existing topsoil horizon is not uniform and is in large <br />areas less than 6 inches. <br />The applicant has committed, on page 13 of Exhibit E, to providing a topsoil layer <br />at least 4 inches in depth on all disturbed surfaces above the anticipated normal <br />water line. Given the shallow depth to groundwater and extent of proposed <br />groundwater lakes, it is possible that topsoil recovery across the site will far <br />exceed the volume necessary to reclaim disturbed land surface to 6 inches or <br />greater, in which case the applicant will provide a minimum of 6 inches of <br />average topsoil depth for revegetation. However, should salvageable topsoil <br />quantities fail meet the requirement for the preferred 6 inch minimum topsoil <br />depth, it is a reasonable option, supported by Construction Materials Rules, for <br />the operator to reclaim the site with the limited topsoil available. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.