My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49068
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:51:00 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:52:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/7/2006
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Letter of 08/01/06
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Alex Schatz <br />March 27, 2006 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />the vicinity include drillers' geologic (lithologic) logs that were used by us to interpolate the <br />geology of the alluvium near the mining area. <br />The alluvium of the Colorado River consists of gravels and cobbles intermixed with sands <br />and clays and ranges in thickness from 20 feet up to 95 feet thick and is underlain by shales and <br />sandstones of the Wasatch formation. The lithologic logs we reviewed sometimes indicate <br />significant clay layers and/or lenses within the alluvium. <br />Hydrogeologic data for the Colorado River alluvium neaz Silt were not available, but typical <br />hydrogeologic data for sands and gravels have been published. Values for hydraulic conductivity <br />range from 100 to 10,000 feet per day. Values of specific yield range from 23-28 percent. Static <br />water levels reported in nearby wells show the water level to within a couple feet of the ground <br />surface elevation. <br />MODFLOW MODEL <br />To allow for estimation of the potential impact on the local water table and the Colorado <br />River in response to dewatering of the pits, a numerical ground water flow model was constructed. <br />The model code utilized was the United States Geological Survey "MODFLOW" model ("Modulaz <br />Finite Difference Ground Water Flow Model"). The public domain pre- and post-processing <br />softwaze, Processing MODFLOW for Windows ("PMWIN"), was used to develop the model files, <br />to assist in model grid layout, and to graphically present the water table and drawdown <br />configurations following each run. We note that MODFLOW is a widely used and accepted model <br />that has become a standard in the industry. <br />Discretization <br />The model domain was bounded by no-flow cells both to the north just beyond the Colorado <br />River and to the south by the plateau along the edge of the flood plain. The model was bounded to <br />the east and west about one mile from the edge of the proposed gravel pits by constant head cells. <br />Model cells near in and around the gravel pits were discretized to be 50-foot squazes. The cells <br />sizes were stepped up to 500-foot squazes at not more than one and a half times the previous cell <br />dimension. This discretization and model domain is presented in Figure 2. <br />The model was created as aone-layer model representing the alluvial layer in which the <br />gravel pits will be mined. The depth of the alluvium was determined from the above-mentioned <br />geologic logs and subtracted from the ground surface elevation for each well. The elevations of the <br />bottom of the alluvium were then contoured using the Kriging method to develop the topography of <br />the base of the alluvium. The top of the alluvium was modeled as a flat surface at the highest <br />elevation of the model domain. <br />Marlin and Wood Water Consultants, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.