My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE49068
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE49068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:51:00 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:52:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/7/2006
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Letter of 08/01/06
From
Banks and Gesso LLC
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rim u!, cd ~ <br />:: Banks and Gesso, LLC <br />6 September 2006 <br />Richard Wenzel <br />Colorado Division of Minerals a d Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />720 Kipling St.,Suite117 <br />Lakewood, Colorado 80215 <br />(303)274-4277 <br />Fax (303) 274-8329 <br />www. ba nksandgesso.com <br />Re: Grand River Park Project (M-200 -046), <br />~esponse to Adequacy Letter of August 1, 2006 <br />Dear Mr. Wenzel: <br />REC`~a~s~.-~® <br />IMP 0 7 [u~iti _~ <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />This letter presents the applicant's response to the Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining, and Safety's adequacy comments concerning the Grand River Park <br />Project, File No. M-2006-046. <br />In response to issues raised in the adequacy review, the applicant has included <br />with this letter revised map exhibits and supplementary text. Revision of map <br />exhibits also reflects a refined understanding of the location of features to be <br />avoided by mining, including certain jurisdictional wetlands and ail and gas <br />infrastructure. The impact of mining will be slightly reduced by recent <br />adjustments, so the new Exhibits C and F may be regarded as a technical <br />revision where adjustments are not recognized as a product of adequacy <br />comments concerning Exhibits J and S. <br />Itemized below are the applicant responses to individual adequacy comments. <br />The Division's comment appears in italics, followed by the applicant response. <br />1. In accordance with this rule, please submit proof of publication circulated <br />in the local newspaper and proof of the public notices submitted to all <br />owners of record of surface lands, easement holders, and owners of <br />record of surface lands that are within 200 feet of the boundary of affected <br />land... <br />Proof of compliance with Rule 1.6.2(1)(g) is attached. Published notice appeared <br />in the Glenwood Springs Post-Intelligencer on May 30, June 6, June 13, and <br />June 20, 2006. Certified mail receipts are enclosed as proof of mailed notices. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.