My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48898
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:49:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Appendix page 1 through A-2
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 15 FISH SURVEY OF THE WILLIAMS FORK RIVER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .~ <br />• <br />3.1 Chemical and Physical Characteristics <br />Selected chemical and physical characteristics measured at three <br />stations is the Williams Fork River are presented in Table 1. Based on <br />- parameters measured or observed, the portion of the river appeared to be <br />suitable habitat for aquatic organisms. The only characteristic which <br />_ may be limiting at times is the amount of sediment deposited on the rock <br />surfaces. <br />General conditions in the river are summarized below. Dissolved <br />oxygen levels were Haar saturation on alI sample dates. The river was <br />slightly alkaline on all dates wit11 pH values ranging between 7.2 and <br />7.5. As is characteristic of streams in the Yampa River drainage <br />(Carlson et al. 1979), conductivity (dissolved salts) values increased <br />during low water periods; minimum values (39-41 Nmho) occurred in the <br />spring, while maxima (725-730 Nmho) were observed in November. Turbidity <br />measurements did not appear to be reflective of conditions is the river. <br />Values were relatively low (less than 20 NTU's) throughout the survey. <br />Maxima which were observed in the spring (12-19 NTU's) were considerably <br />lower than values reported at stations in the Yampa River (Carlson e[ al. 1979). <br />It is possible that the turbidimeter was not operating properly. <br />Physical characteristics were similar to large mountain streams in <br />western Colorado. Bottom substrates were comprised predominantly of <br />gravel, sand, and cobble at all locations. The only notable difference <br />between the three stations was that less cobble occurred at Station 1. <br />During low water periods considerable amounts of silt and detritus <br />covered the rock surfaces both above and below the silo. <br />3.2 Beathic tlacroinvertebrates <br />A total of 56 maeroinvertebrate taxa was collected by Surber sampler <br />from the Williams Fork River in 1980 (Table 2). Thirty-five taxa were <br />found at Station 3 during September, which was the highest number of <br />taxa collected at nay of the stations throughout the year. The lowest <br />number of taxa was 14 which occurred at Stations 1 and 3 is Juae. <br />Total mean densities exhibited considerable variation between the <br />four sample periods (Tables 3, 4, and 5). The highest mean density vas <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.