My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48898
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:49 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:49:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Appendix page 1 through A-2
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 15 FISH SURVEY OF THE WILLIAMS FORK RIVER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Although a single sampling precludes a precise and indepth analysis <br />• of the aquatic macro invertebrate fauna in the Williams Fork River, a few <br />general observations can be made. The fauna consist largely of macroin- <br />vertebrate taxa which are intolerant or facultatively tolerant of organic <br />pollution. There appears to be a relatively high standing crop (density) <br />and species diversity. Many of the species collected such as Baetis <br />spp., Tricorythodes sp. (mayflies), Isogenoides sp. (stoneflies), hydro- <br />psychid caddisflies and certain dipterans are tolerant of environments <br />with relatively high silt loads. In general, the numbers and kinds of <br />invertebrates are characteristic of a moderately silt-stressed western <br />scream. Based on the ecological requirements of the organisms, other <br />types of pollutional stresses (e.R. organic enrichment, toxic metals <br />etc.) are not apparent. Differences in total densities between stations <br />• are probably due more to heteroRenous distribution of the various macro- <br />invertebrate Qroups rather than to any identifiable stresses in the <br />area. $owever, as emphasized at the beginning of this section, no <br />definite statements can be made about the condition of the river based <br />upon a single sampling. Additional sample periods during the spring and <br />early summer are recommended to identify any seasonal differences in <br />composition and abundance. <br />• <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.