My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48738
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:40 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:45:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
FISH & WILDLIFE RESOURCES INFORMATION
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX G
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• the disturbance area .will be taken <br /> entirely out of production at any given time, the <br /> remainder either in an undisturbed, ~re+mining condition, <br /> or in a stage of reclamation, <br /> Using regional range exclosures as a guide, within <br /> one year following establishment of the study area, there <br /> is expected to be a significant increase in plant vigor <br /> and cover, probably reaching a peak in 3 - 4 years. <br /> Thereafter, improvement in the plant community will be <br /> measured in terms of a change in composition, with <br /> more palatable grasses, forbs and shrubs increasing in <br /> percentage of biomass. <br /> Conditions within the sanctuary are expected to <br /> benefit livestock in the long term, since the carrying <br /> capacity of the site is expected to increase substantially. <br /> When returned to grazing in the post-mining phase, forage <br /> conditions, therefore weight gains, should more than <br />. compensate for short-term reductions in stocking rates. <br /> This method is deemed preferable to other management <br /> options, e.g. fertilization, because of distinct <br /> advantages to the fauna in dry years. L. Carpenter <br /> (in litt.) reported that plans on an experimental area <br /> northwest of the lease area failed to respond to <br /> fertilization following the dry winter/spring of 1977. <br /> His findings correspond with those of others who have <br /> attempted fertilization in arid areas and have found <br /> that an absence of moisture can negate the anticipated <br /> results (Nagy and Haufler 1980). <br /> It has been shown that the lease area is primarily <br /> a spring-summer use area for featured species. Therefore <br /> it is in dry years that benefits from livestock exclusion <br /> are expected to be the greatest, since a forage/cover <br /> reserve will be maintained, and increased litter will <br /> tend to retain moisture and delay the site dessication <br />• characteristic of heavy livestock use. <br />-15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.