Laserfiche WebLink
Table 7-$um severity classification based on postfire appearances of litter and soil and soil <br />temperature profiles (Hungertord 1996, DeBano et al. 1998). <br /> Burn Severity <br />Soil and Litter Parameter Low Moderate High <br />Litter Scorched, Charred, Consumed Consumed <br /> Consumed <br />Duff Intact, Surtace Deep Char, Consumed <br /> Char Consumed <br />Woody Debris -Small Partly Consumed, Consumed Consumed <br /> Charred <br />Woody Debris -Logs Charred Charred Consumed, <br /> Deeply Charred <br />Ash Color Black Light Colored Reddish, Orange <br />Mineral Soil Not Changed Not Changed Altered Structure, <br /> Porosity, etc <br />Soil Temp, at 0.4 in (10 mm) X120 °F 210-390 °F >480 °F <br /> (<50 °C) (100-200 °C) (>250 °C) <br />Soil Organism Lethal Temp. To 0.4 in (10 mm) To 2 in (50 mm) To 6 in (160 mm) <br />occurrence of hydrologic events. For a wide range of <br />burn severities, the impacts on hydrology and sedi- <br />ment lose can be minimal in the absence of precipita- <br />tion. However, when a precipitation event follows a <br />large, moderate- to high-burn severity fire, impacts <br />can be far reaching. Increased runoff, peakflowa, and <br />sediment delivery to streams can affect fish popula- <br />tions and their habitat (Rinse 1996). <br />Fire can destroy accumulated forest floor material <br />and vegetation, altering infiltration by exposing voile <br />to raindrop impact or creating water repellent condi- <br />tions (DeBano and others 1998). Loss of soil from <br />hillsIopes produces several significant ecosystem im- <br />pacts. Soil movement into streams, lakes, and ripar- <br />ian zones may degrade water quality and change the <br />geomorphic and hydrologic characteristics of these <br />systems. Soil loss from hillslopea may reduce Bite <br />productivity. <br />Total water yields across the Western United States <br />vary considerably depending on precipitation, evapo- <br />transpiration (ET), soil, and vegetation. The magni- <br />tude of measured increases in water yield the first <br />year after fire can vary greatly within a location or <br />between locations depending on fire severity, cli- <br />mate, precipitation, geology, soils, topography, veg- <br />etationtype, and proportion ofthe vegetation burned. <br />Because increases in water yield are primarily due to <br />elimination of plant cover, with subsequent reduc- <br />tions in the transpiration component of ET, flow <br />increases are greater in humid ecosystems with <br />high prefire ET (Anderson and others 1976). El- <br />evated streamflow declines through time as woody <br />and herbaceous vegetation regrow, with this recov- <br />ery period ranging from a few years to decades. <br />Increases in annual water yield after wildfires and <br />prescribed fires are highly variable (table 2). Hibbert <br />and others (1982) reported a 12 percent increase in <br />water yield after prescribed fire in an Arizona pinyon- <br />juniper forest. Awildfire inthe moetlyponderosa pine <br />Entiat watershed in Washington produced a 42 per- <br />cent increase in water yield the first poatfire year <br />(Helvey 1980). The first-year increase in water yield <br />after a prescribed burn in a Texas grassland was 1,150 <br />percent of the unburned control watershed, but the <br />increase over the control was only 400 percent where <br />a rehabilitation treatment (seeding) was done after <br />the fire (Wright and others 1982). Seeding also ahort- <br />enedthe recovery period from 5 to 2 years. In Arizona <br />chaparral burned by wildfire, the first-year water <br />yield increase exceeded 1,400 percent (Hibbert 1971). <br />Where sail wettability becomes a problem, water yield <br />increases can be very high due to greater stormflows. <br />The effects of fire disturbance on storm pealcflowa <br />are highly variable and complex. They can produce <br />some of the moat profound watershed and riparian <br />impacts that forest managers have to consider. In- <br />tense short duration storms that are characterized by <br />high rainfall intensity and low volume have been <br />associated withhigh stream peakflows and significant <br />erosion events after fires {Newry and others 1999). In <br />the Intermountain Weat, high intensity, short dura- <br />tionrainfall i a rel ativelycommon (Farmer and Fletcher <br />1972). Five minute rainfall rates of 8.4 to 9.2 in hr_1 <br />(213 and 235 mm hr'') have been associated with <br />USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR~63. 2000 <br />